Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Substantiating Appropriate Motion Capture Techniques for the Assessment of Nordic Walking Gait and Posture in Older Adults
Published on: May 12, 2016
Postural and Metabolic Benefits of Using a Forearm Support Walker in Older Adults With Impairments
Chandrasekaran Jayaraman1, Chaithanya Krishna Mummidisetty1, Alexandra Loesch2
1Max Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Center for Bionic Medicine, Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL.
Objective:
To investigate the postural and metabolic benefits a walker with adjustable elbow support (LifeWalker [LW]) can provide for ambulation in population with impairment. The clinical outcomes from the elbow support walker will be compared with standard rollator (SR) and participants predicate device (PD).
Design:
Case-crossover study design.
Setting:
Clinical laboratory.
Participants:
Individuals aged between 18 and 85 years using a rollator walker as primary mode of assistance and certified as medically stable by their primary physician. Participants (N=30; 80% women [n=24]) recruited from a convenient sample provided voluntary consent and completed the study.
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The trunk anterior-posterior (AP) sway (during the 10-meter walk test), oxygen consumption (during the 6-minute walk test), the mean forearm load offloaded to the elbow support as percentage of body weight, and mean peak hand grip load (during the 25-meter walk test) were measured.
Results:
Ambulating with a LW led to (1) reduced trunk sway in the AP direction [(ZLW vs PD= -2.34, P=.018); (ZLW vs SR= -3.461, P=.001)]; (2) reduced erector spinae muscle activation at the left lumbar L3 level [(ZLW vs PD= -2.71, P=.007); (ZLW vs SR= -1.71, P=.09)]; and (3) improved gait efficiency [(ZLW vs PD= -2.66, P=.008) Oxygen cost; (ZLW Vs. SR= -2.66, P=.008) Oxygen cost]. Participants offloaded between 39% and 46% of their body weight through the elbow support armrest while ambulating with the LW. Irrespective of the walker used, participants exerted ∼5%-6% of their body weight in gripping the walker handles during walking.
Conclusions:
Using the forearm support-based LW led to upright body posture, offloaded portions of body weight from the lower extremity, and improved gait efficiency during ambulation in comparison to the SR and the participants' own PD. Further studies focusing on population-specific benefits are recommended.
More Related Videos
08:30Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test, Measurement of Lung Function, and Fixation of the Lung to Study the Impact of Obesity and Impaired Metabolism on Pulmonary Outcomes
Published on: March 15, 2018
07:06Metabolic Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster Larval and Adult Brains
Published on: August 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Muscles that Move the Forearm
Forearm Flexors
The biceps brachii, brachialis, and brachioradialis are forearm flexors. The biceps brachii is made up of two heads. Its long head originates at the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula, whereas that of the short head is...
What is Metabolism?
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Muscles of the Forearm that Move the Hand and Fingers
Anterior Compartment
The anterior compartment muscles originate from the humerus. They primarily function as flexors and are also known as flexor muscles. They typically insert on the carpals, metacarpals, and phalanges. The superficial layer includes the flexor carpi...
Support Reactions
The purpose of the supports is to prevent the translational motion of the system by applying an equal and opposite force and to prevent the system's rotation by applying...