Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

8.7K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
8.7K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.1K
3.1K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.7K
2.7K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.4K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.6K
2.6K
Total Voids in Concrete01:12

Total Voids in Concrete

487
Total voids in concrete encompass gel water volume, capillary pores, and entrapped air. Gel water (retained within the cement hydration products) and physically entrapped or adsorbed water are significant for the hydration process. For complete hydration, it's estimated that the space needed for the products of a cubic centimeter of cement doubles. Capillary pores constitute the unoccupied space within the hydrated cement paste, with their size largely influenced by the water-to-cement...
487

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Logical Study of Moral Responsibility.

Erkenntnis·2025
Same author

Ability and knowledge: from epistemic transition systems to labelled stit models.

Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems·2024
Same author

Should one trust experts?

Synthese·2021
Same author

Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go?

Ethics and information technology·2020
Same author

Conflicting intentions: rectifying the consistency requirements.

Philosophical studies·2019
Same journal

"All the Difference in the World": The Nature of Difference and Different Natures.

Philosophy of the social sciences·2020
Same journal

Nothing Much for Philosophers.

Philosophy of the social sciences·2018
Same journal

Group Freedom: A Social Mechanism Account.

Philosophy of the social sciences·2018
Same journal

The evolution of human warfare.

Philosophy of the social sciences·2011
Same journal

“The Superorganic,” or Kroeber’s hidden agenda.

Philosophy of the social sciences·2010
Same journal

Norms and customs: causally important or causally impotent?

Philosophy of the social sciences·2010
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Real-Time Void Spot Assay
06:39

Real-Time Void Spot Assay

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.7K

Responsibility Voids and Cooperation.

Hein Duijf1

  • 1Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Philosophy of the Social Sciences
|October 30, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores responsibility voids, where groups are morally responsible but no individual is. It finds competitive contexts lack these voids, while cooperative ones may have them depending on uncertainty.

Keywords:
cooperationpractical reasoningresponsibility voidsteam reasoninguncertainty

More Related Videos

Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Verification for Dislocation Reduction in Germanium Epitaxial Layers with Semicylindrical Voids on Silicon
06:57

Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Verification for Dislocation Reduction in Germanium Epitaxial Layers with Semicylindrical Voids on Silicon

Published on: July 17, 2020

2.7K
Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
05:16

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Published on: February 19, 2022

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Real-Time Void Spot Assay
06:39

Real-Time Void Spot Assay

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.7K
Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Verification for Dislocation Reduction in Germanium Epitaxial Layers with Semicylindrical Voids on Silicon
06:57

Theoretical Calculation and Experimental Verification for Dislocation Reduction in Germanium Epitaxial Layers with Semicylindrical Voids on Silicon

Published on: July 17, 2020

2.7K
Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
05:16

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Published on: February 19, 2022

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Moral Philosophy
  • Social Psychology
  • Decision Theory

Background:

  • The concept of collective moral responsibility is debated.
  • Understanding when individuals are not responsible, but groups are, is crucial for ethical frameworks.
  • Existing theories often struggle to account for situations without individual accountability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if responsibility voids exist in group decision-making.
  • To differentiate between competitive and cooperative contexts regarding moral responsibility.
  • To analyze the conditions under which responsibility voids may arise.

Main Methods:

  • Distinguishing between competitive and cooperative decision contexts using team-reasoning.
  • Applying a reasoning-based analysis to cooperation, competition, and moral responsibility.
  • Examining the role of uncertainty in cooperative decision contexts.

Main Results:

  • Competitive decision contexts are argued to be free of responsibility voids.
  • The existence of responsibility voids in cooperative contexts is contingent on the type of uncertainty faced (external vs. coordination).
  • A framework is provided for understanding group moral responsibility.

Conclusions:

  • Responsibility voids can exist, specifically in cooperative decision contexts.
  • The presence of responsibility voids is linked to specific types of group uncertainty.
  • The findings have implications for theories of collective action and moral accountability.