Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Using Acute-phase Reactants to Inform the Development of Instruments for the Updated Psoriatic Arthritis Core Outcome
Musaab Elmamoun1,2, Ying Ying Leung1,2, Denis O'Sullivan1,2
1From the Department of Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
Systemic inflammationˆ is assessed through measurement of acute-phase reactants such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). With few exceptions, most randomized controlled trials (RCT) have assessed acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR) as part of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response criteria. As part of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) working group, we performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the performance of inflammatory biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Methods:
A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed. The search included peer-reviewed articles and scientific meeting abstracts about RCT and longitudinal observational studies that assessed systemic inflammation using acute-phase reactants in PsA. Studies were assessed following the components of the OMERACT filter including construct validity, responsiveness, and predictive validity.
Results:
There were 2764 articles retrieved, and 71 articles were included for this systematic review. Twenty-eight articles reported CRP and/or ESR separately, and the remaining articles reported CRP and/or ESR as part of the ACR response criteria. Studies assessing OMERACT responsiveness provided conflicting reports. Inflammatory biomarkers had construct validity for more active disease. Evidence suggests that an elevation of ESR predicts cardiovascular outcomes.
Conclusion:
Data regarding assessment of systemic inflammation using acute-phase reactants (CRP and ESR) are limited. There is only weak evidence to support normalization of these biomarkers in predicting good clinical outcomes/remission criteria. The predictive value for cardiovascular outcomes was generally good. Further studies to assess systemic inflammation in PsA using acute-phase reactants and other laboratory biomarkers are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Limiting Reactant
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
The Nucleosome Core Particle
The paradox
Nucleosomes, paradoxically, perform two opposite functions simultaneously. On the one hand, their main responsibility is to protect the delicate DNA strands from physical damage and help achieve a higher compaction ratio. While on the other hand, they must allow polymerase enzymes to access DNA...
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...

