Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

14.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
14.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ToxiTaRGET: a multi-omics database for toxicant-responsive molecular targets.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Benchmarking genome choice in functional genomics analyses.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

TaRGET II Data Portal: a multi-omics resource for environmental toxicant studies in mice.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

A Multimodal Single-Cell Epigenomic and 3D Genome Atlas of the Human Basal Ganglia.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Single-cell Multiome Analysis of Chromatin State and Transcriptome in the Human Basal Ganglia.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Single-Cell Atlas of Transcription and Chromatin States Reveals Regulatory Programs in the Human Brain.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings
08:23

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings

Published on: September 30, 2019

6.7K

A non-randomized procedure for large-scale heterogeneous multiple discrete testing based on randomized tests.

Xiaoyu Dai1, Nan Lin1,2, Daofeng Li3

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri.

Biometrics
|November 3, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for analyzing discrete data from next-generation sequencing, improving false discovery rate control in genomic region testing. The novel procedure offers enhanced power and accuracy for biological data analysis.

Keywords:
Discrete P-valuedifferentially methylated regionsmarginal critical functionmultiple testingrandomized testwhole-genome bisulfite sequencing

More Related Videos

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

6.1K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings
08:23

A Random-displacement Measurement by Combining a Magnetic Scale and Two Fiber Bragg Gratings

Published on: September 30, 2019

6.7K
A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

6.1K
Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library
11:14

Primer-Free Aptamer Selection Using A Random DNA Library

Published on: July 26, 2010

25.4K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing generates massive discrete data, posing challenges for traditional statistical methods.
  • Existing multiple testing procedures often assume continuous data, leading to conservative results for discrete genomic tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel multiple testing procedure for improved false discovery rate (FDR) control on heterogeneous discrete genomic tests.
  • To overcome the conservativeness of existing methods in analyzing discrete sequencing data.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel multiple testing procedure based on the marginal critical function (MCF) of randomized tests.
  • Derived upper bounds for positive FDR (pFDR) and positive false non-discovery rate (pFNR).
  • Demonstrated method superiority through simulations and analysis of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) data for differentially methylated region (DMR) detection.

Main Results:

  • The proposed procedure achieves powerful and non-randomized multiple testing for discrete data.
  • Guaranteed that the method's detections encompass those from naive q-value applications.
  • Showcased improved performance over existing methods in simulations and real WGBS data analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The novel procedure offers a more powerful and accurate approach to FDR control in heterogeneous discrete testing scenarios common in genomics.
  • This method enhances the analysis of next-generation sequencing data, particularly for identifying biological regions like DMRs.