Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
Published on: January 2, 2026
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Reoperative Repair for Failed Pyeloplasty in Children: An Updated Series
Deborah L Jacobson1,2, Rachel Shannon2, Emilie K Johnson1,2
1Department of Urology, Northwestern University , Chicago , Illinois.
Insights
Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative pyeloplasty in children demonstrates long-term success for recurrent obstruction after failed primary repair. This minimally invasive approach is feasible, effective, and safe, offering durable symptom relief and improved outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
Background:
- Reoperative pyeloplasty is a common procedure for children experiencing recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after initial pyeloplasty.
- Previous studies indicated short-term and intermediate outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic repair were comparable to open surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the longer-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in a pediatric population.
- To assess the feasibility, efficacy, safety, and durability of this minimally invasive approach.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 36 children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair between January 2008 and June 2018.
- Procedures included pyeloplasty (31 cases) and ureterocalicostomy (5 cases).
- Data collected included operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, and postoperative follow-up imaging and functional assessments.
Main Results:
- Median follow-up was 35.3 months, with 50% of patients followed for over 3 years.
- Postoperative ultrasound showed improvement in 91.2% of children, with stable or improved differential renal function in all assessed by diuretic renography.
- All patients were symptom-free at the last follow-up, with a low rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5 complications (5.6%).
Conclusions:
- Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair is a feasible, effective, and safe procedure for children with failed pyeloplasty.
- The technique offers durable, long-term success and symptom resolution.
- This study represents the largest series of its kind, supporting the use of minimally invasive techniques for complex pediatric urological reconstructions.
Purpose:
Reoperative pyeloplasty is commonly used in children with recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty. We previously reported on reoperative robot-assisted laparoscopic repair for failed pyeloplasty in 16 children and concluded that short-term and intermediate outcomes were comparable to open reoperative repair. In this updated series we describe longer term outcomes from an extended study.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of consecutive children with prior failed primary pyeloplasty who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair at a single institution from January 2008 to June 2018.
Results:
Overall, 36 children 0.6 to 15.2 years old (median 3.7) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair (pyeloplasty in 31, ureterocalicostomy in 5) at a median of 24.3 months (range 3.9 to 136.7) after primary repair. Median reoperative time was 285.0 minutes (range 207 to 556) and median length of stay was 1 day (1 to 8). Crossing vessels were present in 8 of 30 children (26.7%) with prior open repair and in 0 of 6 with prior minimally invasive repair. Clavien-Dindo grade 1 to 2 perioperative complications occurred in 4 children (11.1%) and grade 3 to 5 complications in 2 (5.6%). Median followup was 35.3 months (range 1.4 to 108.3), with 18 children (50.0%) being followed for more than 3 years. Postoperative ultrasound in 34 children revealed improvement in 31 (91.2%), stability in 2 (5.9%) and worsening hydronephrosis in 1 (2.9%). All 11 children undergoing preoperative and postoperative diuretic renography demonstrated stable or improved differential renal function. All children were symptom-free at last followup.
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the largest series of robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children. Our results indicate the feasibility, efficacy, safety and durability of this procedure.
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Resistors In Series
In a series circuit, the...

