Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Isolation and Differentiation of Primary White and Brown Preadipocytes from Newborn Mice
Published on: January 25, 2021
Detection of copy number variations in brown and white layers based on genotyping panels with different densities
Wioleta Drobik-Czwarno1,2, Anna Wolc3,4, Janet E Fulton4
1Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. wdrobik@iastate.edu.
Background:
Copy number variations (CNV) are an important source of genetic variation that has gained increasing attention over the last couple of years. In this study, we performed CNV detection and functional analysis for 18,719 individuals from four pure lines and one commercial cross of layer chickens. Samples were genotyped on four single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms, i.e. the Illumina 42K, Affymetrix 600K, and two different customized Affymetrix 50K chips. CNV recovered from the Affymetrix chips were identified by using the Axiom® CNV Summary Tools and PennCNV software and those from the Illumina chip were identified by using the cnvPartition in the Genome Studio software.
Results:
The mean number of CNV per individual varied from 0.50 to 4.87 according to line or cross and size of the SNP genotyping set. The length of the detected CNV across all datasets ranged from 1.2 kb to 3.2 Mb. The number of duplications exceeded the number of deletions for most lines. Between the lines, there were considerable differences in the number of detected CNV and their distribution. Most of the detected CNV had a low frequency, but 19 CNV were identified with a frequency higher than 5% in birds that were genotyped on the 600K panel, with the most common CNV being detected in 734 birds from three lines.
Conclusions:
Commonly used SNP genotyping platforms can be used to detect segregating CNV in chicken layer lines. The sample sizes for this study enabled a detailed characterization of the CNV landscape within commercially relevant lines. The size of the SNP panel used affected detection efficiency, with more CNV detected per individual on the higher density 600K panel. In spite of the high level of inter-individual diversity and a large number of CNV observed within individuals, we were able to detect 19 frequent CNV, of which, 57.9% overlapped with annotated genes and 89% overlapped with known quantitative trait loci.
Related Concept Videos
What is Variation?
The range, standard deviation, standard error, and variance are the different measures of variation.
Range: The range is the difference between its maximum and...
Wood Panel Products
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Variation of Atmospheric Pressure
Assuming the air temperature is constant at a given altitude and that the ideal gas law of thermodynamics describes the atmosphere to a good approximation, one can find the variation of atmospheric pressure with height.
Let p(y) be the atmospheric pressure at...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

