Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
Improving Spatial Resolution and Test Times of Visual Field Testing Using ARREST
Andrew Turpin1, William H Morgan2, Allison M McKendrick3
1School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne.
Purpose:
Correctly classifying progression in moderate to advanced glaucoma is difficult. Pointwise visual field test-retest variability is high for sensitivities below approximately 20 dB; hence, reliably detecting progression requires many test repeats. We developed a testing approach that does not attempt to threshold accurately in areas with high variability, but instead expends presentations increasing spatial fidelity.
Methods:
Our visual field procedure Australian Reduced Range Extended Spatial Test (ARREST; a variant of the Bayesian procedure Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing [ZEST]) applies the following approach: once a location has an estimated sensitivity of <17 dB (a "defect"), it is checked that it is not an absolute defect (<0 dB, "blind"). Saved presentations are used to test extra locations that are located near the defect. Visual field deterioration events are either: (1) decreasing in the range of 40 to 17 dB, (2) decreasing from >17 dB to "defect", or (3) "defect" to blind. To test this approach we used an empirical database of progressing moderate-advanced 24-2 visual fields (121 eyes) that we "reverse engineered" to create visual field series that progressed from normal to the end observed field. ARREST and ZEST were run on these fields with test accuracy, presentation time, and ability to detect progression compared.
Results:
With specificity for detecting progression matched at 95%, ZEST and ARREST showed similar sensitivity for detecting progression. However, ARREST used approximately 25% to 40% fewer test presentations to achieve this result in advanced visual field damage. ARREST spatially defined the visual field deficit with greater precision than ZEST due to the addition of non-24-2 locations.
Conclusions:
Spending time trying to accurately measure visual field locations that have high variability is not productive. Our simulations indicate that giving up attempting to quantify size III white-on-white sensitivities below 17 dB and using the presentations saved to test extra locations should better describe progression in moderate-to-advanced glaucoma in shorter time.
Translational Relevance:
ARREST is a new visual field test algorithm that provides better spatial definition of visual field defects in faster test time than current procedures. This outcome is achieved by substituting inaccurate quantification of sensitivities <17 dB with new spatial locations.
More Related Videos
11:12Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
Published on: September 18, 2012
11:44Real-Time DC-dynamic Biasing Method for Switching Time Improvement in Severely Underdamped Fringing-field Electrostatic MEMS Actuators
Published on: August 15, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Field Effect Transistor
Chromatographic Resolution
The effectiveness of separation can be evaluated by determining the level of separation between two neighboring peaks in a chromatogram, which represents the individual components of a sample.
In chromatography,...
Electric Field
In the new picture, imagine that the first charge sets up an electric field independent of all other charges in the universe. When another charge comes in its vicinity, the second charge experiences an electric force depending on the electric field at that point. The source charge does not...