Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Communicating health risks in science publications: time for everyone to take responsibility
Alexandra L J Freeman1, David J Spiegelhalter2
1Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. alex.freeman@statslab.cam.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Research that is poorly communicated or presented is as potentially damaging as research that is poorly conducted or fraudulent. Recent examples illustrate how the problem often lies with researchers, not press officers or journalists. The quest for publication and 'impact' must not outweigh the importance of accurate representation of science; herein, we suggest steps that researchers, journalists and press officers can take to help ensure this.
More Related Videos
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Communication
Communication
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Relative Risk