Evaluation of EDTA- and DPA-Based Microdilution Phenotypic Tests for the Detection of MCR-Mediated Colistin Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
Published on: February 14, 2018
Thomas Büdel1, Mathieu Clément1,2, Odette J Bernasconi1,2
11 Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract:
The emergence of the colistin-resistant (COL-R) Enterobacteriaceae represents a worrying health issue. However, only a portion of these strains may carry the plasmid-mediated mcr colistin resistance genes. We evaluated the ability of both ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based and dipicolinic acid (DPA)-based broth microdilution (BMD) tests to detect mcr-1 to mcr-5 producers. Of 92 Enterobacteriaceae (85 COL-R), 44 mcr-positive strains (39 Escherichia coli, 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 2 Salmonella spp.) were tested. EDTA (100 μg/mL) was tested in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB), whereas the DPA (900 μg/mL) was used in cation-adjusted MHB. Results were categorized as positive if in presence of chelator strains exhibited ≥3 two fold MIC decrease compared to the COL MIC alone. The EDTA-based BMD assay detected 41 mcr-positive strains, but 22 false-positive strains (including 12 E. coli and 4 K. pneumoniae) were recorded (sensitivity [SN], 93.2%; specificity [SP], 54.2%). The DPA-based BMD assay detected 37 mcr-positive strains, with 7 false-negative (2 E. coli, 3 K. pneumoniae, 2 Salmonella spp.) strains (SN, 84.1%; SP, 100%). Overall, the EDTA-based BMD assay is not accurate to detect mcr producers, whereas the DPA-based BMD test ("colistin-MAC test") demonstrated good accuracy, but only when implemented for E. coli strains (SN, 94.9%; SP, 100%). With the aim to prevent the dissemination of mcr-possessing E. coli strains, the COL-MAC test could be implemented by clinical laboratories that are unable to perform molecular tests. Moreover, this assay could be applied to screen large collections of isolates to reveal the expression of new mcr-like genes not yet targeted by the current molecular assays.
Insights
The dipicolinic acid (DPA)-based broth microdilution test, or colistin-MAC test, accurately detects mcr-producing Escherichia coli. This method is valuable for clinical labs lacking molecular testing capabilities to prevent the spread of colistin-resistant bacteria.
Area of Science:
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Microbiology
Background:
- Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae pose a significant public health threat.
- Plasmid-mediated mcr genes are responsible for colistin resistance in a subset of these strains.
- Accurate detection of mcr gene carriers is crucial for infection control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-based and dipicolinic acid (DPA)-based broth microdilution (BMD) tests for detecting mcr-1 to mcr-5 producing Enterobacteriaceae.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of these assays.
- To determine the utility of the DPA-based assay (colistin-MAC test) for clinical laboratories.
Main Methods:
- Tested 92 Enterobacteriaceae strains (85 colistin-resistant) for mcr genes.
- Utilized EDTA (100 μg/mL) in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) and DPA (900 μg/mL) in cation-adjusted MHB for BMD assays.
- Defined detection as ≥3 two-fold MIC decrease in the presence of chelator compared to colistin alone.
Main Results:
- The EDTA-based BMD assay showed 93.2% sensitivity but 54.2% specificity, with numerous false positives.
- The DPA-based BMD assay exhibited 84.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity overall, with 7 false negatives.
- The DPA-based BMD test demonstrated high accuracy (94.9% sensitivity, 100% specificity) specifically for mcr-producing Escherichia coli.
Conclusions:
- The EDTA-based BMD assay is not reliable for detecting mcr producers.
- The DPA-based BMD test (colistin-MAC test) is accurate for detecting mcr-producing E. coli.
- The colistin-MAC test is a viable alternative for clinical laboratories unable to perform molecular tests, aiding in preventing the dissemination of mcr-carrying E. coli.
Related Concept Videos
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a...
EDTA: Chemistry and Properties
EDTA: Conditional Formation Constant
For the equilibrium reaction of the metal with the...
EDTA: Auxiliary Complexing Reagents
EDTA: Direct, Back-, and Displacement Titration
Direct titration involves buffering the metal ion solution to the desired pH and directly titrating with standard EDTA until the endpoint. The optimum pH ensures a large conditional formation constant of metal−EDTA and visibility of the free indicator color in the solution. In addition, auxiliary complexing reagents are used to prevent the precipitation of metal hydroxides...
Complexometric EDTA Titration Curves

