Developments in integrative modeling with dynamical interfaces
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Methods for the Self-integration of Megamolecular Biopolymers on the Drying Air-LC Interface
Published on: April 7, 2017
E Sila Ozdemir1, Ruth Nussinov2, Attila Gursoy3
1Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koc University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey.
Abstract:
Proteins are dynamic, and this holds especially for their surfaces. They display ensembles of conformations, which allows them to interact with diverse partners, often via the same patch of surface, and execute their distinct functions. Binding a specific partner can stimulate - or suppress - a distinct signaling pathway. This diversity poses a challenge: how to reliably model a specific protein-protein interaction (PPI)? This problem is compounded in protein assemblies, which are typically large, involving multiple protein-protein interfaces. Integrative modeling (IM), which combines diverse data, has emerged as the most promising strategy; however, modeling dynamical interfaces, often at the detailed level, which are at the heart of reliable predictions of assemblies, still poses a challenge. Here we review hurdles and advances in integrative modeling of dynamical interfaces; while some could have been predicted or expected, others transformed modeling in unanticipated ways. We further comment on what we believe could be possible future advances.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
Growth Models with Integration: Problem Solving
Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals
Integration by Parts: Definite Integrals
Dynamic Equilibrium

