Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Sublingual Immunotherapy as an Alternative to Induce Protection Against Acute Respiratory Infections
Published on: August 30, 2014
Accuracy of Provider-Documented Child Immunization Status at Hospital Presentation for Acute Respiratory Illness
Mersine A Bryan1,2, Annika M Hofstetter3,2, M Patricia deHart4
1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; mersine@uw.edu.
Insights
Provider documentation of child immunization status at hospital presentation for respiratory illness is inaccurate, overestimating vaccination rates. This leads to missed opportunities for essential immunizations during and after hospitalization.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate documentation of child immunization status is crucial for public health initiatives.
- Assessing the reliability of provider documentation versus immunization information systems is vital for improving vaccination coverage.
- Children presenting with acute respiratory illnesses represent a key opportunity for healthcare providers to address immunization gaps.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of healthcare provider documentation of child immunization status upon hospital presentation for acute respiratory illness.
- To determine the association between provider-documented up-to-date (UTD) immunization status and actual immunization receipt during and after hospitalization.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on children aged 16 years or younger admitted for respiratory illnesses.
- Provider-documented UTD status was compared against the Washington State Immunization Information System (WAIIS) as the gold standard.
- Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and logistic regression were used to analyze accuracy and associations.
Main Results:
- Provider documentation indicated 92% of children were UTD, while WAIIS records showed only 42% were UTD.
- Provider-documented UTD status demonstrated high sensitivity (98.4%) but low specificity (12.2%) and a positive predictive value of 44.6%.
- Only 20% of children due for vaccines received them during hospitalization, and 44% within 30 days post-discharge, with no significant association with provider-documented UTD status.
Conclusions:
- Provider documentation of UTD immunization status in children with respiratory illnesses is inaccurate and overestimates vaccination rates.
- The discrepancy between documented and actual immunization status represents a missed opportunity to administer vaccines during and after hospital stays.
- Improving the accuracy of immunization record-keeping and leveraging hospital encounters are essential for enhancing childhood vaccination coverage.
Objectives:
To assess (1) the accuracy of child immunization status documented by providers at hospital presentation for acute respiratory illness and (2) the association of provider-documented up-to-date (UTD) status with immunization receipt during and after hospitalization.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of children ≤16 years old treated for asthma, croup, bronchiolitis, or pneumonia at a children's hospital between July 2014 and June 2016. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and provider-documented UTD immunization status (yes or no) at presentation were obtained from the medical record. We compared provider-documented UTD status to the gold standard: the child's UTD status as documented in the Washington State Immunization Information System (WAIIS). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of provider-documented UTD status were calculated. We assessed the association of provider-documented UTD status and immunization during and within 30 days posthospitalization using multivariable logistic regression.
Results:
Among 478 eligible children, 450 (94%) had provider-documented UTD status at hospital presentation and an active WAIIS record. Overall, 92% and 42% were UTD by provider documentation and WAIIS records, respectively, with provider-documented UTD status having 98.4% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.4%-99.7%), 12.2% specificity (95% CI: 8.5%-16.8%), and 44.6% positive predictive value (95% CI: 39.7%-49.5%). Per WAIIS records, 20% and 44% of children who were due for vaccines received a vaccine during or within 30 days posthospitalization, respectively. There was no significant association between provider-documented UTD status and immunization during or after hospitalization.
Conclusions:
Provider-documented UTD immunization status at hospital presentation for children with respiratory illnesses overestimates UTD status, creating missed opportunities for immunization during and after hospitalization.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Hospitals-I

