Related Experiment Videos
Assessment of a practitioner's perception of scleral contact lens complications
Andrew D Pucker1, Katherine M Bickle2, Lisa A Jones-Jordan2
1University of Alabama at Birmingham, School of Optometry, United States.
Purpose:
The purpose of this survey was to better understand scleral lens (SL) practitioners' fitting preferences and minor SL complications and their subsequent treatments.
Method:
Practitioners who attended the 2017 Global Specialty Lens Symposium were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire that was created by the investigators, a survey that asked practitioners about their SL fitting experience and preferences, their patients' experience with poor SL wetting, SL fogging, ocular symptoms (redness, pain/discomfort, dryness), and blurred central and side vision, and how the practitioners treated these conditions.
Results:
This study analyzed data from 164 SL practitioners. The practitioners had been in practice for 16.3 ± 13.4 years, had been fitting SL for 5.5 ± 5.0 years, and fit 7.4 ± 7.1 SL/month. Practitioners preferred a SL with a final central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm and an overall diameter between 15.1 mm to 16.5 mm. Poor SL wetting (90.8% of practitioners documented condition), SL fogging (84.8%), blurred central vision (40.2%), ocular redness (34.8%), ocular dryness (24.4%), ocular pain/discomfort (20.7%), and blurred side vision (12.8%) were encountered by the practitioners. Practitioners preferred treating poor wetting and fogging with lens removal, cleaning, and reapplication, blurred central vision with a lens power change, blurred side (peripheral) vision, ocular redness, and ocular pain with a lens parameter change, and dryness with artificial tears.
Conclusions:
Most SL practitioners preferred a SL central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm, and they occasionally encountered SL-related complications in their practice, which they treated similarly to corneal gas permeable CLs.