Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Introducing Shear Stress in the Study of Bacterial Adhesion
Published on: September 2, 2011
Mesh Sensitivity Analysis for Quantitative Shear Stress Assessment in Blood Pumps Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Sascha Gross-Hardt1,2, Fiete Boehning1,3, Ulrich Steinseifer1,4
1Department of Cardiovascular Engineering,Institute of Applied Medical Engineering,Helmholtz Institute,RWTH Aachen University,Pauwelsstrasse 20,Aachen 52074, Germany.
Accurate blood damage prediction in devices requires careful mesh refinement. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations show that a y+ value below 0.2 is crucial for precise shear stress quantification, reducing errors in hemolysis predictions.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Fluid Dynamics
- Computational Science
Background:
- Blood recirculating devices aim to reduce blood trauma by minimizing nonphysiologic shear stresses.
- Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is increasingly used for hydraulic and hemocompatibility assessments, but direct hemolysis predictions remain limited.
- Near-wall mesh resolution significantly impacts shear stress quantification in complex flow regions, affecting blood damage prediction accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the required mesh refinement for accurate shear stress quantification in critical areas of a rotary centrifugal blood pump.
- To determine the influence of mesh resolution on numerical hemolysis prediction accuracy.
- To establish a reliable mesh quality criterion (y+) for CFD simulations of blood pumps.
Main Methods:
- Performed three-dimensional CFD simulations of a generic centrifugal blood pump using varying mesh sizes (3x10^6 to 30x10^6 elements).
- Quantified shear stress at meshing-sensitive hotspots (blade leading edge, tip clearance gap) using the nondimensional mesh characteristic number (y+).
- Calculated hemolysis using an Eulerian scalar transport model to evaluate mesh-related errors.
Main Results:
- The nondimensional mesh characteristic number (y+) underestimated maximum wall shear stress by 60% on average with a recommended value of 1, but was accurate below 0.1.
- Mesh insensitivity for hemolysis prediction was achieved with a maximum y+ below 0.2, requiring approximately 18x10^6 mesh elements.
- Coarser meshes resulted in meshing-related errors of up to 25% in hemolysis predictions.
Conclusions:
- Precise shear stress quantification and accurate hemolysis prediction in blood pumps necessitate stringent mesh refinement, particularly in regions with complex flow.
- A maximum y+ value below 0.2 is identified as a critical threshold for reliable CFD-based hemocompatibility assessment.
- Future research should focus on the transferability of these findings to different geometries and the adaptation of blood damage models for improved quantitative predictions.
More Related Videos
09:20The Assembly and Application of 'Shear Rings': A Novel Endothelial Model for Orbital, Unidirectional and Periodic Fluid Flow and Shear Stress
Published on: October 31, 2016
11:38Visualization and Quantification of TGFβ/BMP/SMAD Signaling under Different Fluid Shear Stress Conditions using Proximity-Ligation-Assay
Published on: September 14, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Shearing Stress
The average shearing stress can be calculated by dividing the shear by the area of the cross-section.
Mesh Analysis
A fundamental concept in mesh analysis is the definition of meshes and mesh currents. A mesh is a closed...
Shearing Stresses in a Beam: Problem Solving
Mesh Analysis with Current Sources
Current Source in One Mesh: The analysis process is straightforward when a current source is found in only one mesh within the circuit. Mesh currents are assigned as usual, with the mesh containing the current source excluded from the analysis. Kirchhoff's voltage law...
Elastic Strain Energy for Shearing Stresses
Mesh Analysis for AC Circuits
The process of harmonizing these impedances begins with a clear understanding of the input and output signals. Once these signals are known, the...