Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

10:22
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
8.8K
Quantification of tomographic PIV uncertainty using controlled experimental measurements: erratum
Applied Optics
|November 22, 2018
Summary
This erratum addresses an error in the author listing for a previously published article in Applied Optics. The correction ensures accurate author attribution for the scientific record.
Area of Science:
- Optics and Photonics
- Scientific Publishing
Background:
- Accurate author attribution is critical in scientific publications.
- Previous publications may contain errors requiring correction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correct the author listing in a specific Applied Optics publication.
- To ensure the integrity and accuracy of the scientific record.
Main Methods:
- Identification of the specific article requiring correction (Appl. Opt. 57, 420 (2018)).
- Issuance of an official erratum to amend author information.
Main Results:
- The erratum provides the corrected author list for the identified article.
- Ensures proper credit and recognition for all contributing authors.
Conclusions:
- The correction maintains the high standards of accuracy in scientific documentation.
- This ensures the reliability of citation and future research referencing the work.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
51.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
51.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures
81.8K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
81.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
101.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
101.1K
The Uncertainty Principle
31.8K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.8K
Uncertainty: Overview
1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K

