Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

07:12
A Standard and Reliable Method to Fabricate Two-Dimensional Nanoelectronics
Published on: August 28, 2018
10.5K
Three-dimensional assessment of lower limb alignment: Accuracy and reliability.
J Fürmetz1, J Sass1, T Ferreira2
13D-Surgery, Department of General, Trauma- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Munich LMU, Germany.
The Knee
|November 27, 2018
Summary
A new method for 3D lower limb alignment assessment using 24 landmarks on CT scans shows low variability and high reliability for knee joint angles, aiding surgical planning.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Medical imaging
- Biomechanical analysis
Background:
- Three-dimensional (3D) surgical planning and patient-specific implants are gaining traction in orthopedics.
- Lack of standardized protocols for 3D lower limb bone model analysis hinders pre-operative planning.
- Established 2D long standing radiographs (LSRs) offer standardized alignment assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a prerequisite for pre-operative planning by establishing a standardized 3D alignment assessment protocol for the lower limb.
- To define landmarks and evaluate their reliability for analyzing 3D bone models.
- To address the need for validated methods in 3D orthopedic analysis.
Main Methods:
- Defined 24 landmarks on 3D bone models from computed axial tomography (CT) scans for 3D alignment assessment.
- Three observers with varying experience levels tested the landmarks across three specimens.
- Evaluated intraobserver and interobserver variability and calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for resulting axes and joint angles.
Main Results:
- Low intraobserver and interobserver variability observed, with mean deviation <5 mm for all landmarks.
- High ICC values (>0.8) for most joint angles and axis deviations, indicating good reliability.
- Excellent ICC (>0.95) for all knee joint angles, demonstrating high consistency.
Conclusions:
- The defined landmarks enable a standardized 3D lower limb alignment assessment with low variability and high reliability, irrespective of examiner experience.
- This method provides a reliable protocol for 3D malalignment testing.
- 3D pre-operative analysis can improve understanding of deformities and influence surgical planning.
Keywords:
3D anatomy3D bone modelingAlignmentComputed tomographyPatient-specific implantPre-operative planningMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy
14.9K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy
3.7K
3.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
101.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
101.1K
Accuracy and Precision
15.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...
15.3K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation
1.3K
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
1.3K

