Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
Published on: July 16, 2016
Acupuncture for Infantile Colic: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
Dabin Lee1, Hojung Lee1,2,3, Jiwon Kim1
1College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Acupuncture shows potential for treating infantile colic by reducing crying and feeding issues. However, current evidence is limited, necessitating further rigorous studies to confirm its safety and efficacy for infants.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Background:
- Infantile colic significantly impacts infant and parental quality of life.
- Minimal acupuncture, a gentle needling technique, is used for infantile colic.
- Clinical evidence for acupuncture's efficacy and safety in infants is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical evidence for the safety and efficacy of acupuncture in treating infantile colic.
- To review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for infantile colic.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases (PubMed, Cochrane, etc.) up to January 2017.
- Included only RCTs of infants (0-25 weeks) treated with acupuncture.
- Assessed study quality using risk of bias; meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Four RCTs were included, all from Northern Europe.
- Minimal acupuncture (LI4, ST36) without strong stimulation was used.
- Acupuncture appeared to alleviate colic symptoms with minor adverse effects, but evidence was inconclusive due to heterogeneity and small sample sizes.
Conclusions:
- No conclusive evidence currently exists for the safety and efficacy of acupuncture for infantile colic.
- Further rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to establish definitive conclusions.
Introduction:
Infantile colic is a common condition causing considerable deterioration in the quality of life of both infants and their parents. Minimal acupuncture, a gentle needling technique without strong muscle stimulation, has primarily been used to treat this condition, but the clinical evidence of its efficacy and safety is yet to be established. The objective of this review was to assess clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of acupuncture for infantile colic.
Methods:
To identify studies for inclusion, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Wanfang, and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System were searched until January 2017. Only randomised controlled trials of infantile colic in patients aged 0 to 25 weeks, who were treated with acupuncture, were included. To assess the quality, the risk of bias was determined for each study by two authors. The intention was to perform a meta-analysis, but this was not possible in this study due to considerable clinical heterogeneity among the included studies.
Results:
Of the 601 studies identified, only four randomized controlled trials were included in this review. All included studies were conducted in northern European countries. Most studies showed a low risk of bias in most domains. Minimal acupuncture on LI4 or ST36 without strong stimulation was used in all studies. From the narrative analysis, acupuncture appears to be effective in alleviating the symptoms of colic, including crying and feeding and stooling problems, and may have only minor adverse effects. However, clinical evidence could not be confirmed owing to considerable clinical heterogeneity and the small sample sizes of the included studies.
Conclusion:
There is currently no conclusive evidence on the safety and efficacy of acupuncture for infantile colic. Rigorous full-scale randomized controlled trials will be necessary in future.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Random and Systematic Errors

