Carbon's Three-Center, Four-Electron Tetrel Bond, Treated Experimentally
Alavi Karim1, Nils Schulz2, Hanna Andersson1,3
1Department of Chemistry and Molecular Biology , University of Gothenburg , SE-412 96 Gothenburg , Sweden.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|November 29, 2018
Summary
Researchers experimentally confirmed the strongest tetrel bond yet, a carbon-centered interaction involving a carbenium ion and a bidentate Lewis base. This discovery offers a new model for studying chemical bonding and reaction mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Chemical bonding
- Noncovalent interactions
- Supramolecular chemistry
Background:
- Tetrel bonding involves group IV elements interacting with electron donors.
- It is a directional interaction, similar to hydrogen and halogen bonding, but less explored.
- Understanding tetrel bonds is crucial for advancing chemical bonding theories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally investigate a novel carbon-centered tetrel bond, [N-C-N]+.
- To characterize the structure and stability of this tetrel bond complex.
- To compare this tetrel bond with analogous halogen bonds and explore factors influencing its formation.
Main Methods:
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy
- Titration calorimetry
- Reaction kinetics studies
- Crystallography
Main Results:
- Experimental evidence for the existence and structure of the [N-C-N]+ tetrel bond was obtained.
- This represents the strongest tetrel bond reported to date.
- Bidentate Lewis bases stabilize the tetrel bond, while monodentate bases induce reactions.
Conclusions:
- The study confirms a strong, experimentally validated carbon-centered tetrel bond.
- The findings highlight the importance of Lewis base denticity in stabilizing tetrel bonds.
- The observed complex geometry serves as a model for SN2 transition states, aiding reaction mechanism studies.
Related Concept Videos
Resonance
49.6K
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N-O and N=O bonds.
49.6K
Predicting Molecular Geometry
35.7K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
35.7K
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II
36.5K
sp3d and sp3d 2 Hybridization
36.5K
Structure of Benzene: Molecular Orbital Model
11.4K
According to the molecular orbital (MO) model, benzene has a planar structure with a regular hexagon of six sp2 hybridized carbons. As shown in Figure 1, each carbon is bonded to three other atoms with C–C–C and H–C–C bond angles of 120°. The C–H bond length is 109 pm, and the C–C bond length is 139 pm which is midway between the single bond length of sp3 hybridized carbons (154 pm) and sp2 hybridized carbons (133 pm).
11.4K
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cations: Structural Overview
3.5K
Cycloheptatriene is a neutral monocyclic unsaturated hydrocarbon that consists of an odd number of carbon atoms and an intervening sp3 carbon in the ring. The three double bonds in the ring correspond to 6 π electrons, which is a Huckel number, and therefore satisfies the criteria of 4n + 2 π electrons. However, the intervening sp3 carbon disrupts the continuous overlap of p orbitals. As a result, cycloheptatriene is not aromatic.
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group...
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group...
3.5K
Radicals: Electronic Structure and Geometry
4.1K
This lesson delves into the geometry of a radical, which is influenced by the electronic structure of the molecule. The principle is similar to that of a lone pair, where the unpaired electron influences the geometry at the radical center.
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
Accordingly, the structure of a trivalent radical lies between the geometries of carbocations and carbanions. An sp2-hybridized carbocation is trigonal planar, while an sp3-hybridized carbanion is trigonal pyramidal. Here, the difference in geometry is...
4.1K


