Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology
Hannah M Phelps1, Harold N Lovvorn2
1School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. hannah.m.phelps@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract:
The application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to resect pediatric solid tumors offers the potential for reduced postoperative morbidity with smaller wounds, less pain, fewer surgical site infections, decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and less disruption to treatment regimens. However, significant controversy surrounds the question of whether a high-fidelity oncologic resection of childhood cancers can be achieved through MIS. This review outlines the diverse applications of MIS to treat pediatric malignancies, up to and including definitive resection. This work further summarizes the current evidence supporting the efficacy of MIS to accomplish a definitive, oncologic resection as well as appropriate patient selection criteria for the minimally invasive approach.
Insights
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pediatric solid tumors may reduce complications and recovery time. This review examines MIS efficacy for oncologic resection in children and patient selection criteria.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers potential benefits like reduced morbidity, pain, and hospital stays for pediatric cancer patients.
- Controversy exists regarding the oncologic safety and efficacy of MIS for achieving high-fidelity resections in childhood cancers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the diverse applications of MIS in treating pediatric solid tumors, including definitive resection.
- To summarize current evidence on the efficacy of MIS for oncologic resection in pediatric malignancies.
- To outline patient selection criteria for MIS in pediatric cancer surgery.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies on MIS for pediatric solid tumor resection.
- Analysis of evidence supporting the oncologic outcomes of MIS.
- Identification of criteria for selecting appropriate patients for MIS.
Main Results:
- MIS demonstrates potential for reduced postoperative complications and faster recovery in pediatric cancer surgery.
- Evidence supports the feasibility of achieving oncologic resection through MIS in select pediatric cases.
- Specific patient and tumor characteristics can guide the selection for MIS.
Conclusions:
- MIS is a viable approach for resecting pediatric solid tumors, offering significant advantages.
- Careful patient selection is crucial for optimizing oncologic outcomes with MIS.
- Further research may solidify MIS as a standard of care for specific pediatric malignancies.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

