Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Experimental Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: June 27, 2025
Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during
Manuel Ignacio Monge Garcia1, Zhongping Jian2, Jos J Settels2
1Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario SAS de Jerez, C/ Circunvalación, s/n, 11407, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain. ignaciomonge@gmail.com.
Background:
Maximal left ventricular (LV) pressure rise (LV dP/dtmax), a classical marker of LV systolic function, requires LV catheterization, thus surrogate arterial pressure waveform measures have been proposed. We compared LV and arterial (femoral and radial) dP/dtmax to the slope of the LV end-systolic pressure-volume relationship (Ees), a load-independent measure of LV contractility, to determine the interactions between dP/dtmax and Ees as loading and LV contractility varied.
Methods:
We measured LV pressure-volume data using a conductance catheter and femoral and radial arterial pressures using a fluid-filled catheter in 10 anesthetized pigs. Ees was calculated as the slope of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship during a transient inferior vena cava occlusion. Afterload was assessed by the effective arterial elastance. The experimental protocol consisted of sequentially changing afterload (phenylephrine/nitroprusside), preload (bleeding/fluid bolus), and contractility (esmolol/dobutamine). A linear-mixed analysis was used to assess the contribution of cardiac (Ees, end-diastolic volume, effective arterial elastance, heart rate, preload-dependency) and arterial factors (total vascular resistance and arterial compliance) to LV and arterial dP/dtmax.
Results:
Both LV and arterial dP/dtmax allowed the tracking of Ees changes, especially during afterload and contractility changes, although arterial dP/dtmax was lower compared to LV dP/dtmax (bias 732 ± 539 mmHg⋅s- 1 for femoral dP/dtmax, and 625 ± 501 mmHg⋅s- 1 for radial dP/dtmax). Changes in cardiac contractility (Ees) were the main determinant of LV and arterial dP/dtmax changes.
Conclusion:
Although arterial dP/dtmax is a complex function of central and peripheral arterial factors, radial and particularly femoral dP/dtmax allowed reasonably good tracking of LV contractility changes as loading and inotropic conditions varied.
Related Concept Videos
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes....
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
The Contractile Ring
A small GTPase, RhoA, controls the function and assembly of the contractile ring. RhoA belongs to the Ras superfamily of proteins. The activation of formins by RhoA promotes...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Performing a Simple Data Analysis using MS-Excel Function
SUM: This function calculates the total sum of a range of values. It's the foundation for aggregating data, essential for determining overall trends and totals in datasets.
AVERAGE: It computes the mean value of a given set of numbers, providing a quick insight into the central...
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's...

