Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Evaluation of Radiolabeled Girentuximab In Vitro and In Vivo
Tais Basaco1,2, Stefanie Pektor3, Josue M Bermudez4
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. tais.basaco@dcb.unibe.ch.
Abstract:
Girentuximab (cG250) targets carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), a protein which is expressed on the surface of most renal cancer cells (RCCs). cG250 labeled with 177Lu has been used in clinical trials for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of RCCs. In this work, an extensive characterization of the immunoconjugates allowed optimization of the labeling conditions with 177Lu while maintaining immunoreactivity of cG250, which was then investigated in in vitro and in vivo experiments. cG250 was conjugated with S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid (DOTA(SCN)) by using incubation times between 30 and 90 min and characterized by mass spectrometry. Immunoconjugates with five to ten DOTA(SCN) molecules per cG250 molecule were obtained. Conjugates with ratios less than six DOTA(SCN)/cG250 had higher in vitro antigen affinity, both pre- and postlabeling with 177Lu. Radiochemical stability increased, in the presence of sodium ascorbate, which prevents radiolysis. The immunoreactivity of the radiolabeled cG250 tested by specific binding to SK-RC-52 cells decreased when the DOTA content per conjugate increased. The in vivo tumor uptake was < 10% ID/g and independent of the total amount of protein in the range between 5 and 100 µg cG250 per animal. Low tumor uptake was found to be due to significant necrotic areas and heterogeneous CAIX expression. In addition, low vascularity indicated relatively poor accessibility of the CAIX target.
Related Concept Videos
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
Drug Product Performance: In Vitro–In Vivo Correlation
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Nursing Evaluation
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias

