Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
Published on: December 31, 2017
Readmissions after Firearm Injury Requiring Vascular Repair
Jeffrey J Siracuse1, Alik Farber1, Thea James2
1Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Insights
Firearm injuries requiring vascular repair increase readmission rates at 90 and 180 days. This highlights the need for targeted interventions and a greater role for vascular surgeons in managing these complex trauma cases.
Area of Science:
- Trauma Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Firearm injuries are associated with significant morbidity and high healthcare resource utilization.
- Patients with trauma and vascular surgery needs face elevated risks of hospital readmission.
- This study aimed to evaluate readmission risks in patients undergoing vascular repair following firearm injuries.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the risk of hospital readmission among patients who underwent vascular repair after a firearm injury.
- To identify factors associated with readmission in this patient population.
- To establish baseline readmission rates for targeted intervention strategies.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the National Readmission Database (2011-2014) for firearm injury admissions.
- Comparison of patients with and without vascular repair using multivariable analysis.
- Assessment of readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days post-discharge.
Main Results:
- Vascular repair patients had higher rates of severe illness, more diagnoses, and more procedures.
- Patients undergoing vascular repair showed higher readmission rates at 90 (18.1%) and 180 days (22.3%).
- Multivariable analysis confirmed vascular repair as a significant predictor for 90-day (OR 1.38) and 180-day (OR 1.24) readmissions.
Conclusions:
- Firearm injuries necessitating vascular repair are linked to increased 90- and 180-day readmissions.
- Findings provide baseline data for developing interventions to reduce readmissions in this cohort.
- Vascular surgeons can play a more proactive role in addressing this public health concern.
Background:
Firearm injuries can be morbid and potentially have high resource utilization. Historically, trauma and vascular surgery patients are at higher risk for readmissions. Our goal was to assess the risk for readmission among patients undergoing vascular repair after a firearm injury.
Methods:
The National Readmission Database was queried from 2011 to 2014. All firearm injuries with or without vascular repair were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was conducted to assess the effect of concurrent vascular repair on readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days.
Results:
There were 42,184 firearm injury admissions identified, where 93.3% did not undergo vascular repair and 6.7% required vascular repair. The overall in-hospital death rate was 8.2%. Average age was 29.9 ± 0.2 years, and 89.2% were male. Intent was most frequently assault (61.2%) followed by unintentional injury (26.5%), suicide (5.2%), and legal intervention (3.1%). Patients with vascular repair compared to those without vascular repair were more frequently admitted at teaching hospitals (85.2% vs. 81.8%, P = 0.042), had higher Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) extreme severity of illness, AHRQ risk of mortality, New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and had more diagnoses and procedures (P < 0.0001). Patients with vascular repair compared to those without vascular repair also more frequently sustained abdominal/pelvis injury (40.4% vs. 23.4%, P < 0.0001) and were more likely to have anemia (5.9% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.009). Patients undergoing vascular repair had a higher rate for 30-day (8.9% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.0001), 90-day (18.1% vs 9.5%, P < 0.0001), and 180-day (22.3% vs. 13%, P < 0.0001) readmission. Kaplan-Meier analysis of unadjusted data showed a higher readmission rate over time with vascular repair. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that vascular repair was not associated with higher 30-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.72, P = 0.14) but was for 90-day (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68, P = 0.001) and 180-day readmission (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45, P = 0.009). Additional factors associated with 30-day readmission were higher NISS, discharge to a care facility, and Elixhauser score. Other factors associated with 90-day readmission were unintentional intent of injury, NISS, discharge to a care facility, and Elixhauser score. Factors also associated with 180-day readmission were insurance type, unintentional intent of injury, NISS, care facility discharge, and Elixhauser score.
Conclusions:
Firearm injury resulting in vascular injury was associated with increased readmissions at 90 and 180 days. This study establishes baseline rates for readmission after vascular repair for firearm traumas and allows opportunity for improvement through targeted interventions for these patients. Vascular surgeons can have a more active role in managing this high-profile public health issue.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Overview of DNA Repair
Chemically...
Seedless Vascular Plants
Base Excision Repair
The first step of...
Nucleotide Excision Repair
Requirements for Human Life
Oxygen
Atmospheric air is only about 20 percent oxygen, but that oxygen is a key component of the chemical reactions that keep the body alive, including the reactions that produce ATP. Brain cells are susceptible to a lack of oxygen because they require a...

