Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

51.9K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
51.9K
Korotkoff Sounds01:12

Korotkoff Sounds

8.2K
Korotkoff sounds are the specific sounds heard while measuring blood pressure using a sphygmomanometer, typically with a stethoscope or a Doppler device. They are named after Russian physician Nikolai Korotkov, who first described them in 1905. These sounds correspond to turbulent blood flow in the artery as the blood pressure cuff is gradually released after inflation.
During blood pressure assessment, inflating the cuff 30 millimeters of mercury above the patient's systolic blood pressure...
8.2K
Heart Sounds01:15

Heart Sounds

3.6K
Heart sounds are generated by the turbulence in blood flow due to the closing of heart valves. These sounds are best perceived slightly away from the valves, where the blood flow disseminates the sound.
Auscultation is the process of listening to these internal body sounds using a stethoscope. The heart produces four types of sounds, but only two—S1 and S2—can usually be heard with a stethoscope.
S1, also known as the "lub" sound, is caused by the closure of atrioventricular (A-V)...
3.6K
Soundness of Cement01:17

Soundness of Cement

567
The soundness of cement refers to the ability of cement paste to retain its volume after setting. Unsound cement can lead to expansion and structural damage due to the presence of free lime, magnesia, and calcium sulfate. Free lime hydrates very slowly, expanding and causing unsoundness, which is difficult to detect because it intercrystallizes with other compounds. Magnesia also reacts with water, forming crystals that can disrupt the cement's structure. Calcium sulfate can create...
567
Sound Waves01:01

Sound Waves

13.0K
Sound waves can be thought of as fluctuations in the pressure of a medium through which they propagate. Since the pressure also makes the medium's particles vibrate along its direction of motion, the waves can be modeled as the displacement of the medium's particles from their mean position.
Sound waves are longitudinal in most fluids because fluids cannot sustain any lateral pressure. In solids, however, shear forces help in propagating the disturbance in the lateral direction as well....
13.0K
Sound Intensity00:58

Sound Intensity

4.8K
The loudness of a sound source is related to how energetically the source is vibrating, consequently making the molecules of the propagation medium vibrate. To measure the loudness of a source, the physical quantity of interest is the intensity. This is defined as the energy emitted per unit of time per unit of area perpendicular to the sound wave's propagation direction. Since the total energy is greater if the source vibrates for a longer duration and over a larger area, dividing the...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spanish Readers Skip Articles Regardless of Gender and Number Agreement.

Journal of eye movement research·2026
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanning.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Unexpected sounds induce a rapid inhibition of eye-movement responses.

Psychophysiology·2024
Same author

Parafoveal Processing and Transposed-Letter Effects in Developmental Dyslexic Reading.

Dyslexia (Chichester, England)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.7K

Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Martin R Vasilev1, Fabrice Br Parmentier2,3,4, Bernhard Angele1

  • 11 Bournemouth University, Department of Psychology, Poole, UK.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|December 7, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Unexpected deviant sounds disrupt reading by increasing fixation time on words. This auditory distraction temporarily suppresses the programming of the next eye movement, affecting reading performance.

Keywords:
Deviance distractionauditory distractorseye-movementsreading

More Related Videos

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K
Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

28.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

6.7K
Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

15.2K
Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

28.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Oddball sound paradigms demonstrate that unexpected auditory stimuli capture attention.
  • Previous research has not extensively explored how deviant sounds impact complex cognitive tasks like reading.
  • Understanding auditory distraction is crucial for designing environments that minimize cognitive load.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the disruptive effects of deviant sounds on reading performance.
  • To quantify the impact of auditory distraction on eye movement patterns during reading.
  • To determine the temporal dynamics of auditory distraction during reading.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel eye-tracking methodology to record reading behavior.
  • Participants read sentences silently and while exposed to task-irrelevant auditory stimuli.
  • A deviant sound (white noise) was presented unexpectedly during fixation on target words, contrasted with a standard tone.

Main Results:

  • Deviant sounds significantly increased fixation durations on target words compared to standard sounds.
  • Auditory distraction effects emerged approximately 180 milliseconds after fixation onset.
  • The impact of deviant sounds on reading was independent of the lexical frequency of the target words.

Conclusions:

  • Deviant sounds prolong fixation durations on words, indicating reading disruption.
  • The findings support the hypothesis of temporary motor suppression induced by deviant sounds.
  • Deviant sounds appear to inhibit the planning of subsequent saccades, rather than interfering with lexical processing.