Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Patient-specific Modeling of the Heart: Estimation of Ventricular Fiber Orientations
Published on: January 8, 2013
Left ventricular activation-recovery interval variability predicts spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia in
Bradley Porter1, Martin J Bishop1, Simon Claridge1
1School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Background:
Enhanced beat-to-beat variability of repolarization is strongly linked to arrhythmogenesis and is largely due to variation in ventricular action potential duration (APD). Previous studies in humans have relied on QT interval measurements; however, a direct relationship between beat-to-beat variability of APD and arrhythmogenesis in humans has yet to be demonstrated.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore the beat-to-beat repolarization dynamics in patients with heart failure at the level of ventricular APD.
Methods:
Forty-three patients with heart failure and implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator devices were studied. Activation-recovery intervals as a surrogate for APD were recorded from the left ventricular epicardial lead while pacing from the right ventricular lead to maintain a constant cycle length.
Results:
During a mean follow-up of 23.6±13.6 months, 11 patients sustained ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VT/VF) and received appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies (antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy). Activation-recovery interval variability (ARIV) was significantly greater in patients with subsequent VT/VF than in those without VT/VF (3.55±1.3 ms vs 2.77±1.09 ms; P=.047). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve 0.71; P=.046) suggested high- and low-risk ARIV groups for VT/VF. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the time until first appropriate therapy for VT/VF was significantly shorter in the high-risk ARIV group (P=.028). ARIV was a predictor for VT/VF in the multivariate Cox model (hazard ratio 1.623; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.393; P=.015).
Conclusion:
Increased left ventricular ARIV is associated with an increased risk of VT/VF in patients with heart failure.
More Related Videos
07:24Reduction in Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Improvement in Function in Failing Hearts using Algisyl-LVR
Published on: April 8, 2013
09:40Induction of Right Ventricular Failure by Pulmonary Artery Constriction and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Mice
Published on: May 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Anatomy of the Heart
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies