Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

07:07
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
9.2K
Electronic patient identification for sample labeling reduces wrong blood in tube errors.
Richard M Kaufman1, Anh Dinh2, Claudia S Cohn3
1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Transfusion
|December 15, 2018
Summary
Electronic patient identification significantly reduces wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors, a key factor in preventing ABO-mismatched transfusions. This technology is crucial for improving transfusion safety and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Transfusion Medicine
- Patient Safety
- Laboratory Science
Background:
- Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) errors are a preventable cause of ABO-mismatched red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.
- Electronic patient identification systems aim to reduce WBIT errors, but their effectiveness requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of electronic patient identification systems in reducing WBIT errors.
- To compare WBIT rates between manual and electronic patient identification methods.
- To assess WBIT rates in mislabeled samples to understand their contribution to transfusion errors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis comparing WBIT rates at hospitals with manual versus electronic patient identification.
- Prospective typing of mislabeled samples to determine WBIT rates in samples with minor labeling errors.
- Evaluation of WBIT error causes and frequencies at individual sites.
Main Results:
- Electronic patient identification was associated with approximately a fivefold reduction in WBIT errors compared to manual identification (adjusted WBIT rates: 1:14,606 vs. 1:3046).
- Significant variation in WBIT rates was observed among individual sites.
- Mislabeled (rejected) samples showed a high WBIT rate (1:71 unadjusted, 1:28 adjusted), highlighting the importance of sample rejection protocols.
Conclusions:
- Electronic patient identification systems are effective in reducing WBIT errors during pretransfusion sample collection.
- Rejecting samples with even minor labeling errors is critical for mitigating the risk of ABO-incompatible transfusions.
- Continued vigilance and implementation of robust identification systems are essential for transfusion safety.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
1.4K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Several factors...
1.4K
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy
7.2K
To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
7.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error
7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K

