Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

In Vitro ELISA Test to Evaluate Rabies Vaccine Potency
Published on: May 11, 2020
Microcontainers for protection of oral vaccines, in vitro and in vivo evaluation
Christoffer von Halling Laier1, Blake Gibson2, Jorge Alberto S Moreno1
1Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, Oersteds Plads 345C, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark.
Abstract:
Oral vaccines are highly desirable due to simple logistics, mass vaccination potential and for mucosal immunity. Subunit vaccines are preferred due to high safety, but are inherently difficult to deliver orally, thus providing motivation for the use of advanced oral delivery systems. Polymeric devices in micrometer size (microcontainers) were tested here for this purpose. Microcontainers were loaded with a vaccine consisting of spray dried cubosomes with OVA and Quil-A, and coated with a pH-sensitive lid for oral delivery to C57Bl/6 mice. The microcontainers were explored in vitro and in vivo for their potential as oral vaccine delivery system in an oral prime-boost setting and as an oral booster after a subcutaneously injected prime. The residence time of microcontainers in the small intestine was less than one hour. Eudragit® L100-55 was therefore chosen as lid material on the microcontainers as it remained stable in vitro at pH 4.7, which simulated the maximal pH of the stomach, and allowed release of the cubosomes within 30-60 min at pH 6.6, which simulated the mean pH of the distal half of the small intestine. In vitro small angle X-ray scattering showed that cubosomes dissolved in small intestinal fluid when not confined in microcontainers but when loaded into microcontainers they were released as hexosomes. However, while microcontainers could protect and release particles with OVA and Quil-A within relevant time frames in vitro, an immune response was not elicited in vivo after oral administration. Nonetheless, some effect was observed when the microcontainers were used to deliver oral boosters following a subcutaneous prime. This work indicates that oral vaccination with subunit vaccines has potential when combined with a parenteral prime and that oral delivery systems like microcontainers may be used to increase the potency of vaccines with low oral immunogenicity.
More Related Videos
07:33Preparation, Characteristics, Toxicity, and Efficacy Evaluation of the Nasal Self-Assembled Nanoemulsion Tumor Vaccine In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: September 28, 2022
08:15In Vitro Cellular Activity Evaluation of the Nanoemulsion Vaccine Adjuvant Ophiopogonin D
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Oral Cavity
Teeth: The teeth are the hardest structures in our bodies. Humans have two sets of teeth throughout their lifetime: deciduous (baby) teeth and permanent teeth. Each tooth consists of several parts: the crown (visible part), the root (embedded in the jaw), enamel (hard outer...
Protection of Alcohols
Protection
It defines a protecting group as the masking agent to make the more reactive species inert to a given set of conditions. This concept is depicted via the illustration of liquid flow through different outlets in an assembly of pipes. The analogy helps to understand the role...
Zones of Protection
Protective zones are defined by closed dashed lines, containing one or more components. A key characteristic of these zones is the strategic placement of...