Implementation of the Procalcitonin Assay in a Rural Hospital

Objective: Most positive studies in procalcitonin (PCT) utilization were done in large, tertiary medical centers. Furthermore, there is a paucity of data describing the implementation process. This article is the first to describe in detail the implementation process and initial outcomes after 6 months of PCT testing in a rural, 65-bed, primary hospital. Methods: Education before and during PCT implementation as well as facility rollout are described. Initial outcomes were assessed using a before and after quasi-experimental study design comparing 2 identical 6-month time periods: May to October 2016 and May to October 2017. Antibiotic consumption is described with days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (PD). Antimicrobial purchasing costs, admission rates, and length of stay (LOS) are also compared. Results: Antimicrobial consumption was variable with the greatest reduction at 6 months: 856 DOT/1000 PD before versus 576 DOT/1000 PD after (P < .0001). Admission rates and LOS were unaffected. There was no associated savings in antibiotic purchasing costs: $114 189.79 before and $139 829.26 after (difference +$25 639.47). Conclusion: Although implementation of PCT testing is feasible in a rural health care facility, after 6 months, it was associated with a marginal decrease in antibiotic consumption with no decrease in admission rates, LOS, or antibiotic cost savings.