Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2026

Long-term Blood Pressure Measurement in Freely Moving Mice Using Telemetry
Published on: May 17, 2016
Long-Term Stability and Blood Pressure Change Tracking with a Cuffless Wearable Device in Hypertensive Patients
Martin Proença1, Pierre-Antonin Rigon2, Guillaume Bonnier1
1CSEM, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology, Bern, Switzerland.
Background:
Demonstrating reliable tracking of short- and long-term blood pressure (BP) changes is one of the conditions necessary for clinical use of cuffless devices requested by international hypertension societies. This study evaluates the stability of BP estimation over a 6-week period using CSEM's wearable cuffless photoplethysmographic (PPG) BP monitor, and its ability in tracking BP changes in hypertensive patients when compared to a validated oscillometric monitor (Microlife WatchBP Home A).
Methods:
In this method-comparison/feasibility study, thirty patients attended 4 visits over six weeks. During visits, BP was estimated as the median of 5 to 7 consecutive measurements performed with both the cuff-based (Cuff BP) and cuffless (PPG BP) devices. Between-visit systolic and diastolic BP changes (ΔSBP, ΔDBP) were assessed and compared using the mean ± standard deviation of the differences between devices to evaluate PPG BP stability. The concordance rate (CR), defined as the percentage of significant BP changes (ΔSBP > 15 mmHg, ΔDBP > 10 mmHg) showing a coherent direction between devices, was also assessed.
Results:
Thirty hypertensive participants (18/30 female; 54 ± 17years; BMI 29.2 ± 5.5kg/m2) were included. Mean differences between Cuff ΔBP and PPG ΔBP did not differ significantly over time, suggesting stability of PPG BP up to six weeks. Differences between Cuff BP and PPG BP were 0.2 ± 12.8mmHg for ΔSBP and -0.1 ± 7.4mmHg for ΔDBP. The CR for significant BP changes was 83% for SBP and 86% for DBP.
Conclusion:
CSEM's wearable PPG-based cuffless BP monitor appears to provide stable BP estimation and concordant tracking of week-to-month BP changes during antihypertensive therapy when compared with an oscillometric device. High within-visit variability of the oscillometric device despite a standard protocol likely limited the comparison between both methods. These results, if confirmed in a larger sample and against a gold-standard reference, could support the clinical acceptance of PPG-based wearable BP monitors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

