Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026
Surgical Closure of Equine Abdomen, Prevention, and Management of Incisional Complications
Published on: May 10, 2024
The impact of standardized protocol implementation for surgical damage control and temporary abdominal closure after
Tyler J Loftus1, Philip A Efron, Trina M Bala
1From the Department of Surgery (T.J.L., P.A.E., T.M.B., M.D.R., C.A.C., M.S.W., R.S.S., F.A.M., A.M.M., S.C.B.), University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida; and Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center (T.J.L., P.A.E., M.D.R., F.A.M., A.M.M., S.C.B.), University of Florida Health, Gainesville, Florida.
Background:
To standardize care and promote early fascial closure among patients undergoing emergent laparotomy and temporary abdominal closure (TAC), we developed a protocol addressing patient selection, operative technique, resuscitation strategies, and critical care provisions. We hypothesized that primary fascial closure rates would increase following protocol implementation with no difference in complication rates.
Study Design:
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 138 adult trauma and emergency general surgery patients who underwent emergent laparotomy and TAC, comparing protocol patients (n = 60) to recent historic controls (n = 78) who would have met protocol inclusion criteria. The protocol includes low-volume 3% hypertonic saline resuscitation, judicious wound vacuum fluid replacement, and early relaparotomy with sequential fascial closure. Demographics, baseline characteristics, illness severity, resuscitation course, operative management, and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was fascial closure.
Results:
Baseline characteristics, including age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and postoperative lactate levels, were similar between groups. Within 48 hours of initial laparotomy and TAC, protocol patients received significantly lower total intravenous fluid resuscitation volumes (9.7 vs. 11.4 L, p = 0.044) and exhibited higher serum osmolarity (303 vs. 293 mOsm/kg, p = 0.001). The interval between abdominal operations was significantly shorter following protocol implementation (28.2 vs. 32.2 hours, p = 0.027). The incidence of primary fascial closure was significantly higher in the protocol group (93% vs. 81%, p = 0.045, number needed to treat = 8.3). Complication rates were similar between groups.
Conclusions:
Protocol implementation was associated with lower crystalloid resuscitation volumes, a transient hyperosmolar state, shorter intervals between operations, and higher fascial closure rates with no difference in complications.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic study, level IV.
More Related Videos
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019
03:26Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:03Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
01:27Emerging Adulthood
01:15Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
01:19Impact of Groups on Groups
01:25Abdominal Aorta
The celiac trunk, a singular artery, divides into the left gastric artery, which...
01:30Introduction Cardiac Emergencies