Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms02:18

Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms

30.7K
Genetic transfer occurs when genetic information is passed from one organism to another. It occurs via two mechanisms: vertical gene transfer and horizontal gene transfer. Vertical gene transfer occurs when genetic information is transferred from one generation to the next, which happens much more frequently than horizontal gene transfer. Both sexual and asexual reproduction are forms of vertical gene transfer, where one or more organisms pass some or all of their genome onto their progeny.
30.7K
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms02:18

Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms

6.4K
6.4K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.4K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.4K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.2K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.2K
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs01:23

Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs

1.1K
Behavior genetics explores how genetic inheritance influences human behavior. It focuses on how genes, passed from parents to offspring, contribute to the development of behavioral traits and tendencies. This branch of genetics seeks to understand the complex interplay between inherited genetic factors and environmental influences in shaping our behaviors.
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide meta-analysis of quantitatively measured generalized anxiety symptoms in individuals of European ancestry.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Is it time to 'cap and trade' credits for research-funding proposals?

Nature·2026
Same author

Social Media Usage and Its Association With the Social Media Addiction Questionnaire Scale Among Early Adolescents.

JAACAP open·2026
Same author

umx version 4.5: Extending Twin and Path-Based SEM in R with CLPM, MR-DoC, Definition Variables, Ωnyx Integration, and Censored Distributions.

Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies·2026
Same author

A community conversation process to establish resident and service provider perspectives on needs related to use and treatment of opioids and substances.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Genome-wide association study of major anxiety disorders in 122,341 European-ancestry cases identifies 58 loci and highlights GABAergic signaling.

Nature genetics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.8K

Type I Error Rates and Parameter Bias in Multivariate Behavioral Genetic Models.

Brad Verhulst1, Elizabeth Prom-Wormley2, Matthew Keller3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. brad.verhulst@gmail.com.

Behavior Genetics
|December 21, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multivariate twin models often exhibit lower Type I error rates than expected, making statistical tests too conservative. A direct symmetric approach corrects these errors and parameter bias, improving reliability in genetic analyses.

Keywords:
Cholesky decompositionCorrelated factors modelDirect symmetrical matrixTwin modelsType I error

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage
06:46

Automated, Long-term Behavioral Assay for Cognitive Functions in Multiple Genetic Models of Alzheimer's Disease, Using IntelliCage

Published on: August 4, 2018

12.8K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Multivariate twin models are widely used in behavioral genetics.
  • Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) in these models often yield Type I error rates lower than theoretically expected.
  • This conservatism increases with the number of variables, impacting statistical inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Type I error rates in Cholesky decomposition and Correlated Factors models.
  • To evaluate the performance of a direct symmetric approach for estimating variance components.
  • To identify methods that ensure accurate statistical inference in multivariate twin studies.

Main Methods:

  • Two simulation studies were conducted.
  • Type I error rates were examined for Cholesky decomposition and Correlated Factors models.
  • A direct symmetric approach was implemented for estimating variance-covariance matrices.

Main Results:

  • Cholesky and Correlated Factors models showed significantly lower than nominal Type I error rates, especially with more variables.
  • Parameter estimates were slightly biased in these constrained models.
  • The direct symmetric approach yielded Type I error rates consistent with theoretical expectations and unbiased parameter estimates.

Conclusions:

  • Model-implied boundaries in standard multivariate twin models can lead to inflated Type II errors and biased parameters.
  • The direct symmetric approach offers a more statistically robust alternative, correcting error rates and bias.
  • This method is computationally feasible and improves the reliability of genetic and environmental covariance matrix estimation.