Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
Determination and Interpretation of the QT Interval
Arja Suzanne Vink1,2, Benjamin Neumann3, Krystien V V Lieve1
1Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology (A.S.V., K.V.V.L., N.H., S.e.K., M.H.A.S., H.M.J.S., A.A.M.W., P.G.P.), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The tangent and threshold methods for measuring the QT interval in Long QT syndrome (LQTS) show high validity but yield different diagnostic results. Adjusted cutoff values are crucial for accurate LQTS diagnosis and patient management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Genetics
- Medical Diagnostics
Background:
- Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a genetic disorder associated with life-threatening arrhythmias.
- Accurate diagnosis of LQTS can be challenging due to varying methods for QT interval assessment.
- QT interval measurement methods, specifically tangent and threshold, have not been directly compared for their diagnostic performance in LQTS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the tangent and threshold methods for QT interval analysis in LQTS diagnosis.
- To assess the similarities and differences between QT interval measurements using these two methods.
- To provide data to aid in accurate QT assessment for LQTS.
Main Methods:
- Included 1484 individuals from 265 families with confirmed pathogenic variants in LQTS-associated genes (LQT1, LQT2, LQT3) and genotype-negative family members as controls.
- Analyzed electrocardiograms (ECGs) using both tangent and threshold methods to determine inter- and intrareader validity and diagnostic accuracy.
- Established cutoff values based on population percentiles, corrected for heart rate, age, and sex.
Main Results:
- The tangent method yielded QT intervals that were, on average, 10.4 ms shorter than the threshold method (95% limits of agreement ±20.5 ms).
- Both methods demonstrated high inter- and intrareader validity (ICC >0.96) and diagnostic accuracy (AUC >0.84).
- Current guideline cutoffs (QTc interval 480 ms) resulted in similar specificity but different sensitivity between the two methods, with tangent method cutoffs being lower.
Conclusions:
- The QT interval measurement method significantly impacts results, although both tangent and threshold methods are valid for LQTS diagnosis.
- Current guideline cutoffs may lead to misdiagnosis due to method-dependent variations in sensitivity and specificity.
- Adjusted cutoff values specific to the measurement method, correction formula, age, and sex are recommended for accurate LQTS diagnosis. An online calculator is available to assist.
More Related Videos
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
09:19Short Session High Intensity Interval Training and Treadmill Assessment in Aged Mice
Published on: February 2, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Confidence Intervals
A...
Improper Integrals: Infinite Intervals
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...