Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

08:37
Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Lipid Droplet Size and Fusion in Bovine Hepatic Cells
Published on: March 10, 2023
3.4K
Biomechanical Evaluation of Cervicothoracic Junction Fusion Constructs
Jakub Godzik1, Jonathan F Dalton2, Eduardo Martinez-Del-Campo3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
World Neurosurgery
|December 23, 2018
Summary
Rod diameter does not significantly impact subaxial spinal construct stability. Screw-rod and screw-connector-rod constructs offer superior biomechanical stability compared to hook-rod constructs in spinal fusion procedures.
Area of Science:
- Spine biomechanics
- Orthopedic surgery
- Spinal instrumentation
Background:
- Cervicothoracic spinal instability requires surgical stabilization.
- Various instrumentation techniques exist, including hook-rod, screw-rod, and screw-connector-rod constructs.
- Understanding the biomechanical differences between these constructs is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vitro biomechanical stability of different cervicothoracic spinal construct designs.
- To compare the influence of rod diameter and construct type on spinal motion.
Main Methods:
- Six human cadaveric spines (C5-T4) were tested.
- Intact, destabilized, and reconstructed states were analyzed.
- Constructs included hook-rod, screw-rod, and screw-connector-rod designs with varying rod diameters (3.5mm and 4.0mm).
- Global and intervertebral ranges of motion were measured.
Main Results:
- Rod diameter (3.5mm vs 4.0mm) did not significantly affect global stability across construct types.
- Hook-rod constructs showed significantly less stability in lateral bending and axial rotation compared to screw-rod and screw-connector-rod constructs.
- Screw-rod and screw-connector-rod constructs demonstrated comparable stability, with screw-rod showing less axial rotation at C6-C7 with 3.5mm rods.
Conclusions:
- Rod diameter is not a significant factor in subaxial construct biomechanical stability.
- Screw-rod and screw-connector-rod constructs provide superior stability over hook-rod constructs.
- Screw-rod constructs may offer biomechanical advantages over screw-connector-rod constructs in specific spinal segments.
Related Concept Videos
Nuclear Fusion
33.9K
The process of converting very light nuclei into heavier nuclei is also accompanied by the conversion of mass into large amounts of energy, a process called fusion. The principal source of energy in the sun is a net fusion reaction in which four hydrogen nuclei fuse and ultimately produce one helium nucleus and two positrons.
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
A helium nucleus has a mass that is 0.7% less than that of four hydrogen nuclei; this lost mass is converted into energy during the fusion. This reaction produces about...
33.9K
P-N junction
1.2K
A p-n junction is formed when p-type and n-type semiconductor materials are joined together. At the interface of the p-n junction, holes from the p-side and electrons from the n-side begin to diffuse into the opposite sides due to the concentration gradient. This diffusion of carriers leads to a region around the junction where there are no free charge carriers, known as the depletion region. The charge density within the depletion region for the n-side and p-side can be described by the...
1.2K
The Neuromuscular Junction
18.9K
The nervous system consists of complex motor neuron circuits, including upper motor neurons originating from the cerebral cortex and lower motor neurons starting in the spinal cord, coordinating both voluntary and involuntary movements. Among these, somatic motor neurons activate skeletal muscles and are classified into alpha, beta, and gamma types. Alpha neurons are vital for voluntary movement coordination, while gamma neurons adjust muscle spindle sensitivity, and the function of beta...
18.9K
Anchoring Junctions
5.0K
Anchoring junctions are multiprotein complexes that help cells connect to other cells and the extracellular matrix. Anchoring junctions are present on the lateral and basal surfaces of cells, providing strong and flexible connections. Focal adhesions are often formed due to cell interactions with the ECM substrata, which initiate signal transduction via kinase cascades and other mechanisms. Together, they provide stability and tissue integrity. There are three types of anchoring junctions:...
5.0K
Adherens Junctions
6.4K
Strong contact points between adjacent cells anchor them to each other, forming tissues. Such anchoring junctions are of two types – adherens junctions and desmosomes. Adherens junctions are abundant in tissues such as epithelium and endothelium, forming a continuous zone of adhesion called the adhesion belt. In other tissues, such as heart muscle, they appear as clusters, linking the cells to produce coordinated heart muscle contraction.
Adherens Junctions are Dynamic
Adherens Junctions are Dynamic
6.4K
Gap Junctions
9.6K
The cytoplasm of adjacent animal cells can exchange small molecules, ions, and secondary messengers via the communication channels which form the gap junctions. These junctions comprise a few hundred to thousands of molecular channels, each made of two halves, called the connexon hemichannel. A connexon is a hexamer of six transmembrane connexin proteins, which assemble radially, thus forming a pore or channel in the center. One connexon hemichannel docks with a corresponding connexon on the...
9.6K

