Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

973
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
973
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

804
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
804
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

17.9K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
17.9K
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations01:19

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: General Considerations

726
The one-compartment model is a pharmacokinetic tool that models the body as a single, uniform compartment, facilitating the understanding of drug distribution and elimination. This model is particularly beneficial for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, where the drug rapidly circulates throughout the body.
The drug's presence in the body is defined by an equation representing the difference between the rates of drug entry and exit. Key parameters—elimination rate constant,...
726
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

1.8K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Resolving the radiation risk debate.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Mortality among workers at the Rocky Flats Plant, 1951-2017.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same author

To BPE or not to BPE: neutron tenth-value layers in polyethylene with variable boron content for LINAC shielding.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2026
Same author

Mortality among U.S. Industrial Radiographers Exposed to Ionizing Radiation, 1969-2019.

Radiation research·2026
Same author

Radiation Protection Policy in a Nuclear Era -Recommendations from Health Physicists in Response to EO 14300.

Health physics·2026
Same author

Colossus: bridging the gap between big data and radiation epidemiology.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
10:11

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

Published on: October 22, 2014

19.7K

Recent Epidemiologic Studies and the Linear No-Threshold Model For Radiation Protection-Considerations Regarding NCRP

Roy E Shore1, Harold L Beck2, John D Boice3

  • 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, and Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan (retired).

Health Physics
|December 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Recent studies on low-dose radiation and cancer risk support the linear no-threshold model for radiation protection. While risks are small, this model remains the most practical approach for ensuring safety.

More Related Videos

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation
03:20

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation

Published on: August 19, 2025

2.0K
Studying Normal Tissue Radiation Effects using Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels
11:01

Studying Normal Tissue Radiation Effects using Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels

Published on: July 24, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
10:11

Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

Published on: October 22, 2014

19.7K
Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation
03:20

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation

Published on: August 19, 2025

2.0K
Studying Normal Tissue Radiation Effects using Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels
11:01

Studying Normal Tissue Radiation Effects using Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels

Published on: July 24, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Public health

Background:

  • The linear no-threshold (LNT) model is a cornerstone of radiation protection.
  • Recent epidemiologic data on low-dose radiation exposure warrants re-evaluation of the LNT model's applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically assess recent epidemiologic studies (low-dose/low dose-rate) of low linear-energy-transfer radiation and cancer.
  • To determine if these studies support or refute the LNT model for radiation protection.

Main Methods:

  • Review of 29 epidemiologic studies published within the last 10 years.
  • Evaluation of study methodologies, dosimetry, statistical modeling, and specific health outcomes (cancer, heritable effects).

Main Results:

  • Many studies on solid cancers support the continued use of the LNT model.
  • Studies on leukemia and low-dose exposure also lend support to the LNT model.
  • Data on ischemic heart disease were insufficient for conclusions.

Conclusions:

  • The preponderance of recent epidemiologic data supports the continued use of the LNT model for radiation protection.
  • No alternative dose-response model appears more pragmatic or prudent.
  • The LNT model remains the most appropriate framework for radiation protection despite inherent uncertainties at very low doses.