Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Blind Persons Perceive Sight-Restorative Technologies Matters More than We Know.

AJOB neuroscience·2024
Same author

Should research administrators be regulated as carefully as researchers?

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2024
Same author

Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?

Accountability in research·2022
Same author

Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies.

The Hastings Center report·2021
Same author

Stem cell research oversight: personal reflections and public reasoning.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2013
Same author

Stem cells, science, and public reasoning.

Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management]·2012
Same journal

Harm Reduction as an Alternative to Mandated Drug Treatment.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Rethinking Mandated Drug Treatment: Why Expanding Freedom Requires Structural Drug Policy Reform.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Making the Move to a Learning System of Research Ethics.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Musical Performance and Biomedical Human Enhancement: Ethnographic Perspectives on Bioethical Questions.

The Hastings Center report·2026
Same journal

Transformed but Not Cured: The Ethics of Describing Gene-Editing Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.

The Hastings Center report·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Proton Transfer and Protein Conformation Dynamics in Photosensitive Proteins by Time-resolved Step-scan Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy
10:03

Proton Transfer and Protein Conformation Dynamics in Photosensitive Proteins by Time-resolved Step-scan Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: June 27, 2014

18.4K

Rereading Frankenstein: What If Victor Frankenstein Had Actually Been Evil?

Jason Scott Robert

    The Hastings Center Report
    |December 27, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Victor Frankenstein, a mad and bad scientist, was not genuinely evil. Reimagining him as evil offers lessons on science, technology, society, and self-reflection.

    More Related Videos

    Application of Electrophysiology Measurement to Study the Activity of Electro-Neutral Transporters
    11:51

    Application of Electrophysiology Measurement to Study the Activity of Electro-Neutral Transporters

    Published on: February 3, 2018

    7.5K
    Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus by Ribosomal Spacer PCR RS-PCR
    08:51

    Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus by Ribosomal Spacer PCR RS-PCR

    Published on: November 4, 2016

    10.2K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

    Proton Transfer and Protein Conformation Dynamics in Photosensitive Proteins by Time-resolved Step-scan Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy
    10:03

    Proton Transfer and Protein Conformation Dynamics in Photosensitive Proteins by Time-resolved Step-scan Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy

    Published on: June 27, 2014

    18.4K
    Application of Electrophysiology Measurement to Study the Activity of Electro-Neutral Transporters
    11:51

    Application of Electrophysiology Measurement to Study the Activity of Electro-Neutral Transporters

    Published on: February 3, 2018

    7.5K
    Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus by Ribosomal Spacer PCR RS-PCR
    08:51

    Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus by Ribosomal Spacer PCR RS-PCR

    Published on: November 4, 2016

    10.2K

    Area of Science:

    • Literary analysis
    • Ethics in science

    Background:

    • Mary Shelley's Frankenstein remains relevant 200 years later.
    • Victor Frankenstein exhibits traits of a mad (obsessive) and bad (irresponsible) scientist.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze Victor Frankenstein's character beyond conventional interpretations.
    • To explore the implications of reimagining Frankenstein's monster creator as truly evil.
    • To draw contemporary lessons on science, technology, society, and ethics.

    Main Methods:

    • Close reading and critical analysis of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
    • Comparative analysis of Victor Frankenstein's character traits.
    • Conceptual exploration of "evil scientist" and "evil person" archetypes.

    Main Results:

    • Victor Frankenstein is characterized as obsessive, secretive, hubristic, and irresponsible, but not inherently evil.
    • Reimagining Victor Frankenstein as genuinely evil provides a framework for examining modern scientific and societal issues.
    • The study highlights the ethical responsibilities and potential societal impact of scientific endeavors.

    Conclusions:

    • Victor Frankenstein serves as a complex case study for understanding the multifaceted nature of scientific responsibility.
    • Rethinking Frankenstein's creator as evil offers valuable insights into contemporary ethical dilemmas in science and technology.
    • The narrative prompts self-reflection on our own roles within society and our relationship with scientific advancement.