Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?
1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Abstract:
Virtually all of the scholarly literature on responsible conduct in research (RCR) focuses on the integrity of scientists - including why scientists misbehave, and how to improve training and enhance compliance with institutional and federal policies and regulations to prevent research misconduct. What this literature does not yet address is the integrity of those responsible for research administration. This article explores the responsible conduct of research administration and the potential for administrative misconduct. I highlight ways in which a lack of integrity in research administration can jeopardize the progress of science, the careers of researchers, and the reputation of institutions just as much as research misconduct can. Accordingly, I call for policies and appropriate oversight of research administration that are on par with policies governing research misconduct by scientists.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Conduct Disorder
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Torts II

