Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

248
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
248
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

30.0K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
30.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.5K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.5K
Integration of Synaptic Events01:28

Integration of Synaptic Events

3.9K
Synaptic integration mainly includes the summation of graded potentials. Graded potentials, regardless of their type, cause subtle alterations in membrane voltage, resulting in either depolarization or hyperpolarization. These incremental changes, when combined or summed, can propel the neuron toward its threshold. Consider, for example, a membrane experiencing a +15 mV shift, causing it to depolarize from -70 mV to -55 mV. In this scenario, graded potentials govern the membrane's ability to...
3.9K
Block Diagram Reduction01:22

Block Diagram Reduction

559
The process of deriving the transfer function of a control system often involves reducing its block diagram to a single block. This simplification can be achieved through a series of strategic operations, including relocating branch points and comparators. These operations preserve the overall function of the system while allowing for easier manipulation and combination of blocks.
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
559
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.8K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

GBLUP Outperforms Quantile Mapping and Outlier Detection for Enhanced Genomic Prediction.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Assessing the Performance of Machine Learning Methods Trained on Public Health Observational Data: A Case Study From COVID-19.

Statistics in medicine·2024
Same author

Genomic selection performs as effectively as phenotypic selection for increasing seed yield in soybean.

The plant genome·2022
Same author

Optimum designs for non-linear mixed effects models in the presence of covariates.

Biometrics·2017
Same author

Editorial for the Special Issue of Statistical Methods in Medical Research at the occasion of the 10th Anniversary of the Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute.

Statistical methods in medical research·2015
Same author

Transform-both-sides nonlinear models for in vitro pharmacokinetic experiments.

Statistical methods in medical research·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K

Group screening for rare events based on incomplete block designs.

Kent M Eskridge1, Steven G Gilmour2, Luis G Posadas3

  • 1Dept. of Statistics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.

Biotechnology Progress
|December 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Group screening strategies, like incomplete block designs, significantly reduce costs for identifying rare events in large specimen sets. These methods offer substantial savings, especially when event prevalence is low.

Keywords:
group testingmultistagepoolingprevalence

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Metabolomics Analysis of Rare Hematopoietic Stem Cells
08:28

Author Spotlight: Advancing Metabolomics Analysis of Rare Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.5K
Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites
08:08

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites

Published on: November 9, 2019

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Metabolomics Analysis of Rare Hematopoietic Stem Cells
08:28

Author Spotlight: Advancing Metabolomics Analysis of Rare Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.5K
Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites
08:08

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites

Published on: November 9, 2019

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Statistical Science

Background:

  • Many scientific fields, including drug development and diagnostics, involve searching for rare events within large numbers of specimens.
  • Testing each specimen individually is often cost-prohibitive for rare event detection.
  • Group screening, or pooling specimens, offers a more cost-effective approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and compare incomplete block screening designs with other group screening strategies.
  • To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different group screening designs under various conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Review and description of incomplete block screening designs.
  • Comparative analysis of incomplete block designs against other group screening methods (e.g., Dorfman design).
  • Simulation or analysis of cost savings based on specimen number and event prevalence.

Main Results:

  • Incomplete block screening designs can achieve nearly 90% cost savings in specific scenarios (e.g., prevalence of 0.001 with 3876 specimens using ICB-sequential vs. Dorfman).
  • Group screening designs are generally cost-effective for large-scale specimen screening when prevalence is low (≤0.05).
  • No single group screening design is universally optimal; efficiency depends on the specific situation.

Conclusions:

  • Group screening designs, particularly incomplete block designs, offer significant cost-efficiency for rare event detection in large-scale studies.
  • The choice of the most efficient design is contingent on factors like prevalence and the number of specimens.
  • Further research into optimizing group screening strategies for diverse applications is warranted.