Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

8.7K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
8.7K
Expected Value01:15

Expected Value

7.8K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
7.8K
Pulmonary Function Tests01:25

Pulmonary Function Tests

812
Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs)
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
812
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.6K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.6K
Self-Efficacy01:29

Self-Efficacy

224
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capacity to organize and execute actions necessary to manage prospective situations. This belief significantly influences how individuals approach goals, tasks, and challenges across different domains of life.Psychological and Educational ImpactsIndividuals with strong self-efficacy are more resilient in the face of difficulties. They are more likely to adopt effective problem-solving strategies, persist through obstacles, and regulate emotions such as...
224
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests01:24

Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests

435
Renal function tests are crucial for assessing kidney health, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating the kidneys' efficiency in waste elimination, fluid balance, and electrolyte regulation. These tests offer critical insights into kidney function, even though routine measurements may appear normal until there is a significant decline in the glomerular filtration rate or GFR. Typically, signs of kidney impairment only become evident when the GFR falls to about 50% of its normal level.
435

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining pain, function, behavioral symptoms and associations with engagement in meaningful activity for residents with dementia in assisted living.

Aging & mental health·2024
Same author

The association between patient engagement and quality of care interactions among acute care patients with dementia.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Delirium Severity and Physical Function in Hospitalized Persons Living With Dementia: Moderation by Age, Sex, and Race.

Alzheimer disease and associated disorders·2024
Same author

Pilot testing implementation of the pain management clinical practice guideline in nursing homes.

Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Differential Gene Expression in Pain-Related Genes are not Affected by the Presence of Dementia.

Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses·2023
Same author

"I'll fill in the gaps": perspectives of HHAs on promoting aging in place for older adults with low incomes.

Home health care services quarterly·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
12:03

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs

Published on: April 25, 2014

28.7K

Staff Self-Efficacy and Staff Outcome Expectations for Function-Focused Care: Rasch Testing.

Kelly Doran1, Barbara Resnick2

  • 1University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland kdoran@umaryland.edu.

Journal of Nursing Measurement
|December 30, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study assessed two new scales for function-focused care, finding good reliability and some validity. The scales showed internal consistency but were not correlated with exercise levels.

Keywords:
long-term careoutcome expectationsrole modelingself-efficacystaff function-focused care

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes
05:51

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes

Published on: November 3, 2023

8.5K
Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
11:17

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood

Published on: October 12, 2012

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
12:03

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs

Published on: April 25, 2014

28.7K
Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes
05:51

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Impact of Mechanical Ventilation on Diaphragm Function and Patient Outcomes

Published on: November 3, 2023

8.5K
Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
11:17

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood

Published on: October 12, 2012

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Health Promotion
  • Psychometrics
  • Occupational Health

Background:

  • Worksite health promotion projects are crucial for staff well-being.
  • Assessing staff self-efficacy and outcome expectations is vital in healthcare settings.
  • Function-focused care interventions require reliable and valid measurement tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability and validity of two novel scales: Staff Self-Efficacy for Function Focused Care and Staff Outcome Expectations for Function Focused Care.
  • To determine the psychometric properties of these scales using baseline data from a worksite health promotion project.
  • To provide evidence for the utility of these scales in measuring staff perceptions related to function-focused care.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized baseline data from 98 long-term care staff participants.
  • Employed Pearson correlations and Rasch analysis to test scale reliability and validity.
  • Assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and item fit statistics (INFIT/OUTFIT mean square).

Main Results:

  • Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency, with reliability coefficients of .80 for Staff Self-Efficacy and .83 for Staff Outcome Expectations.
  • Most items exhibited acceptable INFIT and OUTFIT mean square statistics, indicating good model fit.
  • A significant correlation was found between the two scales (r = .342, p = .007), suggesting convergent validity. However, neither scale correlated with participants' baseline exercise levels.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides preliminary evidence for the validity and internal consistency of the Staff Self-Efficacy and Staff Outcome Expectations for Function Focused Care scales.
  • Suggestions for refinement are offered to enhance the measures for future research and application.
  • These scales hold potential for use in evaluating function-focused care initiatives in occupational health settings.