Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Fabrication and Design of Wood-Based High-Performance Composites
Published on: November 9, 2019
A methodology to design a performance management system in preventive care.
Federico Rotondo1, Lucia Giovanelli2, Nicoletta Fadda2
1Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, Via Roma, 151, 07100, Sassari, SS, Italy. frotondo@uniss.it.
Developing a performance management system (PMS) for preventive care requires collaboration between academics, physicians, and policymakers. Addressing general process and specific preventive care issues is crucial for effective healthcare planning and evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Public Health Policy
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Preventive care is increasingly vital for global health reforms, aiming to reduce disease burden and healthcare costs.
- A significant gap exists in reliable systems for measuring and evaluating preventive care performance to guide decision-making and improve outcomes.
- This study addresses the need for robust performance management systems in preventive healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define a methodology for designing a performance management system (PMS) for preventive care.
- To effectively support the planning, control, and evaluation of preventive care services.
- To identify critical factors influencing the development and implementation of such a PMS.
Main Methods:
- Employed a participatory action research approach, fostering collaboration between researchers and healthcare practitioners.
- The study involved four distinct phases.
- Conducted within an Italian regional healthcare system undergoing significant reorganization.
Main Results:
- Identified two categories of critical factors affecting preventive care performance management: general process issues and specific preventive care issues.
- General factors include interactions among academics, physicians, and policymakers; workload and bureaucracy impacting employee involvement; and institutional change dynamics.
- Specific factors encompass the heterogeneity of preventive activities, extensive regulations, and incomplete information systems.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative methods involving academics, professionals, and policymakers are essential for developing effective PMS for preventive care.
- Clearly defined roles and responsibilities, alongside improved organizational transparency and communication, are vital for professional engagement.
- Recommendations are provided to policymakers for enhancing the maintenance and utilization of information systems in preventive care.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques V
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability

