Related Experiment Videos
Quantitative analysis of particulate burden in lung tissue
J P Mastin1, L E Stettler, J D Shelburne
1Division of Biomedical and Behavioral Science, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226.
Summary
Human lungs contain millions of exogenous particles, including silica and talc. Automated scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) and gravimetric/X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis effectively quantify lung particulate matter.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Toxicology
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- Particulate matter in human lungs is a significant health concern.
- Various preparation and analytical methods exist for its study.
- Understanding lung particle composition is crucial for assessing exposure and health risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss methods for preparing and analyzing particulate matter in human lungs.
- To present results from two specific analytical techniques.
- To compare the effectiveness of different analytical approaches.
Main Methods:
- Automated scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) for individual particle analysis.
- Gravimetric and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis for bulk particulate matter quantification.
- Comparison of results from SEM/EDX and gravimetric/XRD methods.
Main Results:
- An average of 613 million exogenous particles per gram of lung tissue were identified, primarily silica, talc, aluminum silicates, and rutile.
- Median total particulate matter ranged from 0.33 to 0.41 grams depending on preparation method (ashing vs. acid digestion).
- High correlation (r=0.91 to 0.97) observed between SEM/EDX and gravimetric/XRD analyses.
Conclusions:
- Automated SEM/EDX and gravimetric/XRD are reliable methods for analyzing lung particulate matter.
- Human lungs accumulate significant amounts of exogenous particles.
- The methods provide comparable and valuable data on particle burden and composition.