Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

An Ex vivo Model to Study Hormone Action in the Human Breast
Published on: January 8, 2015
CDK4/6 inhibition versus mTOR blockade as second-line strategy in postmenopausal patients with hormone
Hong-Wei Huang1, Li-Sheng Huang2, Qi-Ni Xu3
1The Seventh Department of Surgery, Puning People's Hospital, Puning.
Background:
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib and abemaciclib) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (everolimus) are effective agents for restoring endocrine sensitivity in patients with advanced breast cancer progression on prior aromatase inhibitors. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare these treatments in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR).
Methods:
The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant publications between January 2000 and June 2018. Treatments were ranked based on a network meta-analysis. Ranking was determined by P-score. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was detected; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used.
Results:
Six trials comprising 4063 patients formed the comparison network. Compared with everolimus plus exemestane, the combinations of palbociclib or abemaciclib with fulvestrant showed similar efficacies in PFS and no differences in ORR. For the CBR, palbociclib demonstrated improvement, while abemaciclib did not. Incidences of severe adverse events did not significantly differ. A total of 29%, 15.9%, and 4% of patients discontinued everolimus, abemaciclib, and palbociclib, respectively, due to toxicity.
Conclusion:
These results suggest similar efficacies between CDK4/6 inhibition and mTOR blockade; however, CDK4/6 inhibitors were associated with favorable toxicity profiles.
Insights
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors show similar efficacy in advanced breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors offer a more favorable toxicity profile, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Advanced breast cancer often progresses on aromatase inhibitors, necessitating alternative treatments.
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors (palbociclib, abemaciclib) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (everolimus) can restore endocrine sensitivity.
- These agents are used in patients with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior aromatase inhibitors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors versus mTOR inhibitors in advanced breast cancer.
- To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR).
Main Methods:
- A network meta-analysis was performed on data from six trials including 4063 patients.
- Searched PubMed and Embase databases for relevant publications from January 2000 to June 2018.
- Treatments were ranked using P-scores; random-effect or fixed-effect models were applied based on heterogeneity.
Main Results:
- Palbociclib and abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant showed similar PFS and ORR compared to everolimus plus exemestane.
- Palbociclib demonstrated improved CBR, while abemaciclib did not show significant improvement.
- Severe adverse events did not significantly differ between treatment groups.
- Discontinuation rates due to toxicity were 4% for palbociclib, 15.9% for abemaciclib, and 29% for everolimus.
Conclusions:
- CDK4/6 inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors exhibit comparable efficacy in advanced breast cancer.
- CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with a more favorable toxicity profile, resulting in lower discontinuation rates.
- These findings support CDK4/6 inhibitors as a preferred treatment option due to better tolerability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Intracellular Hormone Receptors
Types of Hormones
Hormonal Regulation
Hormonal Regulation
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade

