Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem: IV. Continuous phenotypes.

W J Ewens1, R M Green

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Genetic Epidemiology
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simulating the component counts of combinatorial structures.

Theoretical population biology·2018
Same author

RANDOM SAMPLING AND THE RATE OF GENE REPLACEMENT.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

THE PROBABILITY OF FIXATION OF A MUTANT: THE TWO-LOCUS CASE.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017
Same author

Use of cDNA Probes for Typing Cells of B Lymphoid Lineage: Application of Early Response Genes to the Analysis of Mature B Cell Malignancies.

Leukemia & lymphoma·2016
Same author

Lead Selection and Time of Monitoring in Diagnostic Exercise Testing.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

A genetic model having complex linkage behaviour.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2014

This study explores ascertainment corrections for continuous phenotypes. It identifies valid and invalid methods for unbiased parameter estimation, whether the ascertainment process is known or unknown.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Ascertainment bias can significantly impact genetic studies analyzing continuous phenotypes.
  • Accurate parameter estimation requires appropriate corrections for how study participants are selected.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate ascertainment correction methods for continuous phenotypes.
  • To determine the validity of different correction strategies based on knowledge of the ascertainment procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of ascertainment correction procedures.
  • Asymptotic analysis of parameter estimates under various ascertainment scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Identified ascertainment correction methods that ensure asymptotically unbiased parameter estimates even when the ascertainment procedure is unknown.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated that some ascertainment correction methods are valid, while others are not, when the ascertainment procedure is known.

    • Conclusions:

    • The choice of ascertainment correction is critical for the validity of genetic analyses of continuous traits.
    • Provides guidance on selecting appropriate statistical methods to mitigate ascertainment bias in genetic research.