Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement
Philippe Pibarot1, Julien Magne2, Jonathon Leipsic3
1Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada.
Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) increases mortality risk. Multimodality imaging aids in assessing, predicting, preventing, and managing PPM, guiding optimal valve selection and treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) occurs when prosthetic valve size is inadequate for patient body size, leading to high postoperative pressure gradients.
- Severe PPM affects 2-20% of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients, increasing mortality and heart failure rehospitalization risk.
- Accurate assessment of PPM is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes after AVR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of multimodality imaging's role in the assessment, prediction, prevention, and management of PPM post-AVR.
- To highlight strategies for preventing PPM during surgical AVR.
- To discuss the differential diagnosis between PPM and prosthetic valve stenosis using imaging.
Main Methods:
- Risk assessment involves calculating predicted indexed effective orifice area (EOA) based on prosthesis and patient body surface area.
- Prevention strategies include implanting newer generation valves, aortic root/annulus enlargement, or considering transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
- Multimodality imaging, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), is used for PPM assessment.
Main Results:
- PPM is characterized by high transprosthetic velocity/gradients, normal EOA, small indexed EOA, and normal leaflet function.
- TTE is primary for PPM identification, while TEE and MDCT are valuable for assessing leaflet morphology and mobility, differentiating PPM from pathologic valve obstruction.
- Severe symptomatic PPM may be managed with redo surgery or transcatheter valve-in-valve procedures.
Conclusions:
- Multimodality imaging plays a vital role in the comprehensive management of PPM following AVR.
- Early identification and appropriate management of PPM are essential for improving long-term patient prognosis.
- Tailored strategies, including valve selection and procedural techniques, can mitigate the risk and impact of PPM.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

