Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

1.8K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
1.8K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.7K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.7K
Design Example: Setting a Curve Using Design Data01:09

Design Example: Setting a Curve Using Design Data

234
Designing and plotting a curve using field data requires precise calculations and execution. A horizontal curve with a radius of 200 meters and an intersection angle of 20 degrees is established using the method of perpendicular offsets from the long chord. The long chord, which spans between the curve's endpoints, is calculated to be 69.46 meters in length. To maintain accuracy in plotting, intervals of 3 meters are selected along the chord.The engineer determines the offset distances for each...
234
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.4K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.4K
Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

5.4K
Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
5.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual Digital Twins for Arthroplasty: Conceptual Dashboards Integrating Patient Clusters and Clinical Pathways.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

ICD-10 and SNOMED CT Representations of Cognitive Decline in All of Us.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Digital Cousins in Arthroplasty: An Interpretable Clustering Framework.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Clinical Pathways and Digital Twins in MIMIC-IV: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

miniMORPH: A Morphometry Pipeline for Low-Field MRI in Infants.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Maternal HIV viral load threshold for guiding extended infant prophylaxis.

The Journal of infection·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K

A usability design checklist for Mobile electronic data capturing forms: the validation process.

Alice Mugisha1,2, Victoria Nankabirwa3,4, Thorkild Tylleskär5

  • 1Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. mugishaalice@gmail.com.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
|January 11, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new checklist was developed to improve mobile electronic data capturing forms (MEDCFs) usability. This tool addresses limitations of generic heuristics for mobile-specific design, focusing on data capture needs for better user experience.

Keywords:
Mobile electronic data capturing forms (MEDCFs)Specific application domain (SAD) heuristicsUsability

More Related Videos

Data Communication Based on MQTT in a Polymer Extrusion Process
08:15

Data Communication Based on MQTT in a Polymer Extrusion Process

Published on: July 15, 2022

3.8K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study
05:43

Usability Evaluation of Augmented Reality: A Neuro-Information-Systems Study

Published on: November 30, 2022

3.0K
Data Communication Based on MQTT in a Polymer Extrusion Process
08:15

Data Communication Based on MQTT in a Polymer Extrusion Process

Published on: July 15, 2022

3.8K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Software Engineering
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Existing usability heuristics are often too generic for mobile applications, failing to address specific interface and characteristic challenges.
  • Mobile Electronic Data Capturing Forms (MEDCFs) are crucial for health data collection in remote areas but face usability issues, especially with semi-literate users.
  • Current design principles lack focus on data capture specifics and can be excessively long, hindering effective mobile form development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a specialized usability evaluation checklist for designing and assessing MEDCFs.
  • To enhance the usability of MEDCFs, particularly in challenging environments like rural areas.
  • To compare usability criteria perspectives between novice and expert developers.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a literature review of mobile application heuristics and UI design for web forms.
  • Developed an initial 125-question checklist based on data capture categories: form content, layout, input type, error handling, and submission.
  • Validated the checklist with novice and expert developers using criteria including utility, clarity, naming, categorization, and measurability, selecting questions with 85% agreement.

Main Results:

  • The validation process refined the checklist to 30 questions, with form layout being the most represented category.
  • Expert developers showed higher agreement on criteria relevance than novice developers, though overall trends were similar.
  • While questions were deemed useful, clear, and well-categorized, measurability was a common concern for both developer groups. Experts prioritized mandatory fields and GPS usage.

Conclusions:

  • The generated checklist identifies essential design features for improving MEDCF usability.
  • Future work includes testing the checklist's effectiveness with end-users (data collectors) to gather design requirements.
  • Continuous end-user testing will refine the checklist for optimal impact on data collector experience.