Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Digital radiography.

R M Harrison1

  • 1Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, UK.

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|July 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative comparison of digital radiography techniques is challenging due to varied assessment methods and inherent trade-offs between resolution, acquisition time, noise, and dose. A qualitative summary is provided.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wide-Positive Matrix Factorisation of particle number size distributions: A new approach accounting for cyclically changing source profiles.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

EURADOS STRATEGIC RESEARCH AGENDA 2020: VISION FOR THE DOSIMETRY OF IONISING RADIATION.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2021
Same author

Characterization of passive dosimeters in proton pencil beam scanning - A EURADOS intercomparison for mailed dosimetry audits in proton therapy centres.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2021
Same author

High CT doses return to the agenda.

Radiation and environmental biophysics·2019
Same author

Dose distribution of secondary radiation in a water phantom for a proton pencil beam-EURADOS WG9 intercomparison exercise.

Physics in medicine and biology·2018
Same author

COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2017
Same journal

Effective contrast-enhanced preprocessing for intracranial artery segmentation in digital subtraction angiography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Improving Plan Quality in Adaptive Proton Therapy Using an Interactive Dose Modification Tool.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Fetus-Specific Hematopoietic Stem Cell Dosimetry Framework for Leukemia-Relevant Target Cells During Prenatal Development.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiography Technology

Background:

  • Quantitative comparison of digital radiography techniques is hindered by inconsistent methodologies.
  • Variations in assessing imaging performance, such as spatial resolution, complicate direct comparisons.
  • Interdependencies between spatial resolution, acquisition time, noise, and radiation dose exist in all imaging systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the difficulties in quantitatively comparing digital radiography techniques.
  • To provide a qualitative overview of different exposure techniques used in digital radiography.
  • To synthesize existing knowledge on digital radiographic systems and their performance characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Review and analysis of existing literature on digital radiography techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of challenges in quantitative performance assessment.
  • Compilation of a qualitative summary of point, line, and area exposure techniques, referencing prior work.

    • Main Results:

    • Established that a direct quantitative comparison of digital techniques is difficult due to non-standardized methods.
    • Highlighted the trade-offs between key imaging parameters like resolution, acquisition time, noise, and dose.
    • Presented a qualitative summary of exposure techniques in a tabular format.

    Conclusions:

    • A definitive quantitative intercomparison of current digital radiographic systems is of limited value due to ongoing advancements.
    • Qualitative summaries and standardized assessments are crucial for understanding digital radiography performance.
    • Further standardization in measurement techniques is needed for more robust comparisons in digital radiography.