Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inertial Frames of Reference01:03

Inertial Frames of Reference

8.8K
Newton’s first law is usually considered to be a statement about reference frames. It provides a method for identifying a special type of reference frame: the inertial reference frame. In principle, we can make the net force on a body zero. If its velocity relative to a given frame is constant, then that frame is said to be inertial. So, by definition, an inertial reference frame is a reference frame where Newton's first law holds valid. Newton's first law applies to objects with...
8.8K
Non-inertial Frames of Reference01:27

Non-inertial Frames of Reference

7.2K
A reference frame accelerating or decelerating relative to an inertial frame is a non-inertial frame. To help understand this, consider what taking off in an airplane, turning a corner in a car, riding a merry-go-round, and the circular motion of a tropical cyclone all have in common. All these systems are accelerating, decelerating, or rotating relative to the Earth; hence, they all are non-inertial frames. All these systems exhibit inertial forces, which merely seem to arise from motion,...
7.2K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects01:17

Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects

1.4K
In an NMR sample, precise measurement of the absolute absorption frequencies of nuclei is difficult. A standard internal reference compound is added, and the frequency difference between the reference signal and sample signals is measured.
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
1.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel deep learning radiomics model for preoperative evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma differentiation based on computed tomography data.

Clinical and translational medicine·2021
Same author

Mechanocombinatorially Screening Sensitivity of Stretchable Strain Sensors.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2019
Same author

MOF-Derived Isolated Fe Atoms Implanted in N-Doped 3D Hierarchical Carbon as an Efficient ORR Electrocatalyst in Both Alkaline and Acidic Media.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2019
Same author

Radiation-induced glucocorticoid receptor promotes CD44+ prostate cancer stem cell growth through activation of SGK1-Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)·2019
Same author

Fibrotic liver microenvironment promotes Dll4 and SDF-1-dependent T-cell lineage development.

Cell death & disease·2019
Same author

Iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip replacement in highly dysplastic hips: a retrospective study.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.8K

Multiple just-noticeable-difference-based no-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment.

Zijin Gu, Yong Ding, Ruizhe Deng

    Applied Optics
    |January 16, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A new no-reference stereoscopic image quality assessment (SIQA) method uses multiple just-noticeable difference (JND) models. This approach better simulates human visual perception of 3D images, outperforming existing methods.

    More Related Videos

    Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment
    05:00

    Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment

    Published on: June 17, 2020

    5.6K
    Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
    08:04

    Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

    Published on: December 4, 2013

    4.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
    11:35

    The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

    Published on: June 30, 2014

    58.8K
    Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment
    05:00

    Using a Chemical Biopsy for Graft Quality Assessment

    Published on: June 17, 2020

    5.6K
    Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
    08:04

    Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues

    Published on: December 4, 2013

    4.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Computer Vision
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Image Processing

    Background:

    • Just-noticeable difference (JND) models are crucial for understanding the human visual system (HVS).
    • Existing JND models have limited application in stereoscopic image quality assessment (SIQA).
    • No-reference SIQA methods are needed to evaluate 3D image quality without original data.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a novel no-reference SIQA method that accurately predicts perceived 3D image quality.
    • To enhance the simulation of HVS perception for stereoscopic images.
    • To address the limitations of current JND models in SIQA.

    Main Methods:

    • Decomposition of stereoscopic image pairs into multi-scale monocular and binocular views.
    • Extraction of texture and edge information from multi-scale images.
    • Application of monocular, binocular, and depth JND models to extracted features and depth maps.
    • Synthesis of features and mapping to objective quality scores.

    Main Results:

    • The proposed multi-JND model metric demonstrates competitive performance against state-of-the-art SIQA methods.
    • Experimental validation on public 3D image databases confirms the method's effectiveness.
    • The approach shows a significant improvement in predicting perceived 3D image quality.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel SIQA method based on multiple JND models offers a promising approach for evaluating 3D image quality.
    • This method effectively simulates HVS perception in a no-reference scenario.
    • The findings suggest practical applicability and potential for future advancements in stereoscopic image quality assessment.