Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Identification and Quantification of Deranged Metabolites in Critically Ill Patients Using NMR-Based Metabolomics
Published on: November 29, 2024
Comparison of 2 Natural Language Processing Methods for Identification of Bleeding Among Critically Ill Patients
Maxwell Taggart1, Wendy W Chapman1, Benjamin A Steinberg2
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
A rules-based natural language processing (NLP) approach effectively identified bleeding events in clinical notes, outperforming machine learning (ML) methods. This automated NLP method offers a scalable solution for improving patient safety by detecting adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Clinical informatics
- Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Adverse events in large patient populations are difficult to detect using structured data alone.
- Clinical notes contain valuable information about patient events but are challenging to analyze at scale.
- Automated methods are needed to improve the identification of adverse events for enhanced patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and compare two NLP methods: a rules-based approach and a machine learning (ML) approach.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in identifying bleeding events within clinical notes.
- To determine which NLP approach offers superior performance for detecting adverse events.
Main Methods:
- A diagnostic study utilized deidentified clinical notes from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database (2001-2012).
- A rules-based NLP approach was developed using a bleeding-specific dictionary.
- Three ML models (support vector machine, extra trees, convolutional neural network) were trained and compared against the rules-based approach.
- Notes were represented using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and global vectors for word representation (GloVe).
Main Results:
- The rules-based approach demonstrated high sensitivity (91.1%) and specificity (84.6%).
- The rules-based model achieved a positive predictive value of 62.7% and a negative predictive value of 97.1%.
- While ML models showed comparable sensitivity, the rules-based approach exhibited better overall performance, particularly in specificity and negative predictive value.
Conclusions:
- Automated NLP methods can reliably detect adverse events like bleeding in clinical notes.
- The rules-based NLP approach proved more effective than ML methods for identifying bleeding events.
- This study highlights the potential of NLP for scalable adverse event detection, contributing to improved patient safety.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Critical Numbers and the Closed Interval Method
Language
Corballis and Suddendorf (2007) and Tomasello and Rakoczy (2003) highlight the role of language in...
Methods of Classification and Identification
Bleeding in Fresh Concrete
Bleeding can cause several issues in the concrete structure. Sometimes, the rising water gets trapped beneath large aggregate...
What is Natural Selection?
Components of Language

