Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.6K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.7K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.7K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.0K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.9K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.9K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

509
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
509

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Skeletal muscle status and malnutrition as predictors of short-term radiotherapy response and oral mucositis in head and neck cancer.

Precision radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Comparison of Proteomic Analysis of Cerebrospinal Fluid From Neurological Patients With and Without Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Journal of neurochemistry·2026
Same author

Rethinking hypercortisolism screening in obesity and diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Metabolism: clinical and experimental·2026
Same author

Skin Application of Inflammasome Inhibitor MCC950 Prevents Psoriasis-like Cutaneous Manifestations and Associated Systemic Inflammation.

Inflammation·2026
Same author

Dyslipidemias associated with endocrine disorders: a position statement of the working group of the nutrition hormones and metabolism club of the italian society of endocrinology (SIE).

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2026
Same author

Suppression of Ammonia Slip by Smart Reductants in Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxides.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine
04:58

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.0K

Model confidence bounds for variable selection.

Yang Li1,2, Yuetian Luo3, Davide Ferrari4

  • 1Center for Applied Statistics, Renmin University of China.

Biometrics
|January 17, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Model confidence bounds (MCB) offer a new approach to variable selection, providing a range of nested models instead of a single choice. This method quantifies model selection uncertainty, enhancing statistical analysis.

Keywords:
confidence setmodel selectionuncertainty

More Related Videos

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
09:04

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump

Published on: June 1, 2022

3.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine
04:58

A Rapid Method for Modeling a Variable Cycle Engine

Published on: August 13, 2019

8.0K
A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump
09:04

A Modeling and Simulation Method for Preliminary Design of an Electro-Variable Displacement Pump

Published on: June 1, 2022

3.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Econometrics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Traditional variable selection methods often yield a single model, making it difficult to assess uncertainty.
  • Confidence intervals are standard for parameter estimation, but analogous concepts for model selection are less developed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce Model Confidence Bounds (MCB) for variable selection in nested models.
  • Provide a framework to quantify and visualize model selection uncertainty.
  • Develop a graphical tool, the Model Uncertainty Curve (MUC), for assessing variability.

Main Methods:

  • Develop the concept of MCB, defining upper and lower confidence bound models.
  • Implement MCB using a fast bootstrap algorithm.
  • Introduce the Model Uncertainty Curve (MUC) for visualization and comparison of model selection procedures.

Main Results:

  • MCB identifies a set of nested models containing the true model with a given confidence level.
  • The width and composition of MCB assess overall model selection uncertainty.
  • The bootstrap algorithm provides correct asymptotic coverage under general conditions.

Conclusions:

  • MCB offers a robust alternative to single-model selection, improving uncertainty assessment.
  • The MUC provides valuable insights into model selection variability.
  • The proposed methodology is validated by simulations and real-world data examples.