Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

348
R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
348
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

547
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
547
Interpreting Run Charts01:25

Interpreting Run Charts

3.3K
Run charts, essentially line graphs plotted over time, serve as fundamental yet effective tools for process analysis. They chronicle data sequentially, facilitating the identification of trends, shifts, or cyclical movements. This graphical representation is instrumental in determining whether a process is stable or exhibits signs of potential instability indicative of special cause variation. In the healthcare domain, run charts depict infection rates over time, enabling hospitals to monitor...
3.3K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.0K
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation01:24

Mass Spectrum: Interpretation

3.3K
An unknown compound can be established by identifying the molecular ion peak in the mass spectrum. The molecular ion peak is often weak or absent due to the predominance of fragmentation in high-energy electron beams. In such cases, a soft-energy electron beam can be used to scan the spectrum to enhance the intensity of the molecular ion peak. Additionally, chemical ionization, field ionization, and desorption ionization spectra are used to obtain a relatively intense molecular ion peak.To...
3.3K
Interpreting X̄ Charts01:13

Interpreting X̄ Charts

309
Interpreting x̄ charts, a type of control chart used in statistical process control helps monitor the variation in processes over time. The x̄ chart is based on the sample mean and allows for monitoring variations in the process mean over time. These charts are pivotal for quality assurance in manufacturing and other sectors.
An x̄ chart plots the values of individual measurements over time against control limits calculated from historical data. The central line...
309

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement as information about internal versus external criteria: Commentary on Fisher (2026).

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2026
Same author

Validation of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology-Self-Report (HiTOP-SR): Internal structure and construct validity against the MMPI-3 in a community sample.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same author

Distinct Event-Related-Potential Biomarkers of Broad Versus Specific Dimensions of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology Externalizing Spectrum.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Reconstructing Psychopathology: A Data-Driven Reorganization of the Symptoms in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2025
Same author

Reply to Ko, Null within-twin estimates on education and dementia: cautions for within-family contrasts.

European journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Sleep and Maladaptive Personality Traits: A Twin Study.

Journal of sleep research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes
11:19

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes

Published on: March 20, 2018

10.9K

Bifactor and Hierarchical Models: Specification, Inference, and Interpretation.

Kristian E Markon1

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA;

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
|January 17, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hierarchical models, including bifactor models, are crucial in clinical and behavioral sciences for understanding shared and unique variance. Careful specification and interpretation are essential for accurate inferences from these powerful statistical tools.

Keywords:
bifactorhierarchicalhigher ordermodel complexitymodel equivalence

More Related Videos

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.8K
Versatile Technique to Produce a Hierarchical Design in Nanoporous Gold
05:28

Versatile Technique to Produce a Hierarchical Design in Nanoporous Gold

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes
11:19

Multimodal Hierarchical Imaging of Serial Sections for Finding Specific Cellular Targets within Large Volumes

Published on: March 20, 2018

10.9K
Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations
08:03

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.8K
Versatile Technique to Produce a Hierarchical Design in Nanoporous Gold
05:28

Versatile Technique to Produce a Hierarchical Design in Nanoporous Gold

Published on: February 10, 2023

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Science
  • Behavioral Science
  • Psychopathology Research

Background:

  • Hierarchical models, particularly bifactor models, are increasingly central in clinical and behavioral sciences.
  • Despite their prominence, certain aspects of these models remain poorly understood.
  • This study addresses the need for clearer understanding and application of hierarchical modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and contrast bifactor and other hierarchical models with alternative superordinate structure models.
  • To focus on the implications for model comparison and interpretation in statistical analysis.
  • To review issues in specifying and estimating hierarchical models and discuss model fit and selection.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of hierarchical models against other superordinate structure models.
  • Review of specification and estimation techniques for bifactor and hierarchical models.
  • Examination of emerging findings on model fit and selection criteria.

Main Results:

  • Hierarchical models offer a robust framework for dissecting shared and unique variance components.
  • Model comparisons and interpretation require careful consideration of underlying assumptions.
  • Specification and estimation challenges exist in both exploratory and confirmatory modeling.

Conclusions:

  • Bifactor and hierarchical models are powerful tools for analyzing complex data structures in clinical and behavioral research.
  • Effective use necessitates meticulous attention to model specification and the interpretation of results.
  • Further research is needed to refine understanding and application of these models.