Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Assessing the Putative Anticryptococcal Properties of Crude and Clarified Extracts from Mollusks
Published on: December 2, 2022
Functional responses in habitat selection: clarifying hypotheses and interpretations
Joseph D Holbrook1,2, Lucretia E Olson2, Nicholas J DeCesare3
1Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, 82072, USA.
Animals adjust habitat use based on resource availability, a concept called functional response. This study identifies statistical issues in common modeling approaches and offers guidance for better understanding animal distributions and conservation.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Wildlife Management
- Conservation Biology
Background:
- Understanding animal distribution mechanisms is crucial for habitat ecology and management.
- Traditional habitat selection studies often assume constant use relative to resource availability, an assumption challenged by evidence of context-dependent behavior (functional response).
- Existing methods for modeling functional responses in habitat selection lack standardized evaluation, potentially impacting conservation outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and clarify the conceptual and statistical foundations of methods used to model functional responses in habitat selection.
- To evaluate the similarities and differences among various modeling approaches using simulated and empirical data.
- To provide guidance on robust methods for analyzing functional responses to improve animal ecology and management.
Main Methods:
- Review of conceptual and statistical foundations of functional response modeling in habitat selection.
- Evaluation of existing approaches using simulated and empirical datasets.
- Identification and analysis of statistical issues within common modeling techniques.
Main Results:
- Identified statistical challenges in widely used functional response models, including the role of individual-level intercepts and sensitivity to low resource availability data.
- Highlighted discrepancies among different modeling approaches, affecting scientific and conservation conclusions.
- Demonstrated management implications using data from Canada lynx and woodland caribou.
Conclusions:
- Current methods for modeling functional responses in habitat selection possess statistical limitations that can influence ecological and conservation findings.
- Guidance is provided for applying more robust approaches to enhance the understanding of animal habitat selection.
- Clarifying functional response modeling aids in integrating this concept into mainstream habitat ecology and management practices for threatened species.
Related Concept Videos
Habitat Fragmentation
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpreting Run Charts
Responses to Drought and Flooding

