Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
Published on: November 5, 2019
Review of pathology data for regulatory purposes
1Division of Pathology, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. 20204.
Abstract:
This paper describes the review process for pathology data submitted to the Division of Pathology, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition of the Food and Drug Administration. The Division of Pathology independently evaluates the pathology data submitted in support of the safety of a given compound. The submissions are examined for agreement between summarized information and data from individual animals, appropriateness of terminology applied to lesions, and adequacy of information (distribution and severity of observed lesions). Problems and concerns encountered during review sometimes require examination of microscopic slides. The slide review provides an independent characterization of the lesions and a verification of their incidence. We present some problems commonly encountered in our review of the pathology data and describe some recent pathology evaluations. Finally, we suggest some considerations for reporting pathology data that may facilitate regulatory review.
Insights
The Food and Drug Administration
Area of Science:
- Toxicologic pathology
- Regulatory science
- Drug safety evaluation
Background:
- Regulatory submissions require comprehensive pathology data for compound safety assessment.
- Independent review by regulatory agencies ensures data integrity and accurate interpretation.
- Standardized pathology data reporting is crucial for efficient regulatory review.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the pathology data review process at the Food and Drug Administration's Division of Pathology.
- To highlight common challenges and considerations in evaluating toxicologic pathology data.
- To provide recommendations for improving pathology data reporting to facilitate regulatory review.
Main Methods:
- Independent evaluation of submitted pathology data for agreement, terminology, and adequacy.
- Microscopic slide examination for lesion characterization and incidence verification.
- Analysis of common problems encountered during the regulatory pathology review process.
Main Results:
- Systematic review identifies discrepancies in data summarization, lesion terminology, and information adequacy.
- Microscopic slide review confirms or refutes findings and verifies lesion incidence.
- Common issues include data inconsistencies and challenges in lesion characterization.
Conclusions:
- The Division of Pathology's review process ensures independent and thorough evaluation of pathology data.
- Addressing common review challenges can improve the quality and efficiency of regulatory submissions.
- Clearer reporting guidelines for pathology data are recommended to facilitate regulatory review and compound safety assessment.
More Related Videos
07:43A Validatable Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Detection of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Bioshedding Studies of Tears
Published on: July 14, 2023
07:34Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
Published on: November 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions