Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Transcriptomic Analysis of Human Retinal Surgical Specimens Using jouRNAl
Published on: August 14, 2013
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Giangiacomo Bravo1, Francisco Grimaldo2, Emilia López-Iñesta3
1Department of Social Studies and Centre for Data Intensive Sciences and Applications, Linnaeus University, 35195, Växjö, Sweden.
Abstract:
To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals are publishing peer review reports. But it is unclear how this practice affects the peer review process. Here, we examine the effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals involved in a pilot study at Elsevier. By considering 9,220 submissions and 18,525 reviews from 2010 to 2017, we measured changes both before and during the pilot and found that publishing reports did not significantly compromise referees' willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. Younger and non-academic scholars were more willing to accept to review and provided more positive and objective recommendations. Male referees tended to write more constructive reports during the pilot. Only 8.1% of referees agreed to reveal their identity in the published report. These findings suggest that open peer review does not compromise the process, at least when referees are able to protect their anonymity.
Related Concept Videos
Journal Bearings
To better understand the concept of journal bearings, consider a rope winch with dry or...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....
Data Reporting and Recording
What is Behavior?

